Data Characteristics for This Category
Clinical trial pre-screening data in academic promotion scenarios originates from public clinical trial registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP), pharmaceutical company internal R&D pipelines, medical journal articles, conference abstracts, and pharmacovigilance reports. Data update frequencies vary; public registries typically update weekly or monthly, while internal data may change in real-time based on R&D progress. Document structures are diverse, including structured trial protocol summaries, unstructured full research papers, PDF-formatted patient recruitment criteria, and semi-structured adverse drug event reports. Fields and units involve patient inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., age, BMI, specific disease diagnostic codes ICD-10), biomarker results (e.g., serum creatinine levels mg/dL, tumor size cm), treatment regimens (e.g., drug dosage mg/kg, administration frequency), trial phase, and research center geographical locations.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on Model Integration and Configuration
Data source heterogeneity requires model integration to support parsing of various data formats, including content extraction from PDF documents and understanding of semi-structured text. Differences in update frequency, especially the real-time nature of internal R&D data, demand efficient data synchronization mechanisms. This requires configuring incremental update strategies to reduce the overhead of full re-indexing. Complex patient inclusion/exclusion criteria often involve multi-conditional logic. This necessitates high semantic understanding and multi-hop reasoning capabilities for the model to interpret and match these criteria. Numerical fields like biomarkers have units; the model must identify and correctly convert units to avoid misjudgments due to unit inconsistencies. Additionally, trial protocols contain many abbreviations and specialized terms, requiring the model to possess domain knowledge for accuracy.
Configuration Guidelines
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 200 MB | Accommodates large clinical trial protocol PDF document uploads. |
maxContext | 32000 tokens | Adapts to complex patient criteria and multi-document context lengths. |
Chunk size | 800–1200 characters | Balances semantic completeness and recall granularity, suitable for medical text. |
Recall count | 15 entries | Increases coverage of relevant passages for complex queries. |
Similarity threshold | 0.78–0.85 | Balances accuracy and recall, avoiding omission of potentially relevant matches. |
Rerank result count | 7 entries | Ensures the information presented to the user has higher relevance. |
Common Pitfalls
- Symptom: A model channel is configured, but the model responds abnormally during a conversation or displays "model connection failed." Reason: The FastGPT deployment environment cannot directly access model services provided by OneAPI or Ollama, typically due to network isolation or firewall policies.
- Symptom: Uploaded clinical trial protocol PDF files have missing content or parsing errors. Reason: The PDF document has complex internal encoding or contains non-standard fonts, preventing text extraction tools from correctly identifying content.
- Symptom: Query results for patient inclusion/exclusion criteria lack sufficient relevant information or contain misjudgments. Reason: The
Chunk size(segment length) is too short, leading to semantic truncation, or theSimilarity threshold(similarity threshold) is set too high, filtering out some slightly less relevant but valuable information.
How to Verify Configuration
- Upload clinical trial documents in various formats (e.g., PDF, TXT, DOCX). Check file parsing progress and knowledge base segmentation to ensure content completeness and reasonable segmentation.
- Conduct simulated conversation tests for queries involving complex patient screening criteria. Verify whether the model accurately identifies key conditions and provides relevant trial information.
- Adjust
Recall count(number of recalled items) andSimilarity threshold(similarity threshold). Observe the quantity and quality of recalled results returned by the model under different settings. Use manual evaluation to determine the most suitable thresholds for the current business scenario.
Note: The values provided are common starting points. Measure them against your own samples for optimal performance.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-21.