What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for primary and secondary school enrollment organizations, and the materials are enrollment plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The enrollment plan contains enrollment targets, time nodes, and admission rules; the application material checklist contains material names, number of copies, signature fields, and receipts; the admission list contains student names, admission batches, dates, and review signatures. The sources are school internal archives and documents issued by higher authorities, and the update cadence follows the enrollment season and policy adjustments, with version numbers and effective dates marked in the document header. When the materials enter the model integration and configuration stage, the enrollment plan participates in retrieval as the rule basis, the application material checklist and admission list participate in conversational Q&A as verification objects, and the model binding relationship determines which model is used for conversation and retrieval; the materials themselves do not change their readable scope because of model configuration.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationship and channel responses. "Basis items that can be traced back to the original text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the channel key only affects whether the call can succeed.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | The name, date, signature, and current version must be consistent with the document header, and the fields must match the original text | Check the version number and effective date in the plan header, check whether the signature fields are complete, and confirm that the clauses can be traced back |
| Application material checklist | The material names, number of copies, date, and receipt must be consistent with the enrollment plan; missing signatures or receipts means it is incomplete | Compare the checklist item by item with the material requirements in the plan, check the number of copies and dates, and check the receipt signatures |
| Admission list | Student names, admission batches, dates, and review signatures must correspond to the application material checklist, and the names, quantities, and dates in the same record must not conflict | Spot-check the names, batches, and dates in the list and checklist, check the review signatures, and mark inconsistent items |
| Model binding relationship | The five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the usage stages, and the model identifiers are consistent with the channel responses | In the model configuration, check the type labels and model identifiers, run conversation and retrieval to check the response model names, and check maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name or date of the same student does not match between the admission list and the application material checklist. Cause: the two materials were entered separately, no cross-check was performed, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: the number of clauses in the enrollment plan is inconsistent with the checklist requirements, and the wrong version is cited when replying to parents. Cause: the old version of the plan was not archived, and the current version was not marked with an effective date.
- Symptom: the checklist lacks signatures or receipts, and the basis items cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: signatures were not completed during material circulation, and receipts were not checked during archiving.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to the corresponding stages respectively, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken and the quoted text budget.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials and see whether the answer provides a traceable source.
- Check the version numbers and effective dates in the headers of the enrollment plan, application material checklist, and admission list, and mark unsynchronized versions.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels and model identifiers of the five model categories against the model names returned by the channel.