What this category's data looks like
Materials for undergraduate program setup and dynamic adjustment are mainly program setup application forms, talent cultivation plans, and expert review opinions. The sources are on-campus academic affairs and school archives, and the update cadence follows application, revision, and filing milestones. When these three types of materials enter this feature, their roles differ: the application form carries the program name, code, program length, and application date; the cultivation plan carries the course structure, credit count, and revision version; the expert review opinions carry the review conclusion, expert list, and signed receipt. Field characteristics are concentrated in four places: name, quantity, date, and signature. When the same record is compared across materials, it is prone to situations such as inconsistent name spellings, inconsistent credit counts, misalignment between the review date and the application date, and missing signatures or receipts. The business basis query requires that entries can point back to the original text, so materials must remain on the current version, and each basis must correspond to a specific material and field location, making it easy to review item by item when replying to parents or writing it into a plan.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (reply limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context it can accommodate. "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are then completed by the model. The reply limit is controlled by a slider for the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup application form | The name, code, program length, and application date must be consistent with the current filing, and signatures and receipts must be complete | Check item by item against the application form fields, confirm the date and signature locations, and record the original text passages that can be pointed back to |
| Talent cultivation plan | The course structure, credit count, and revision version must be consistent with the application form's wording | Compare the quantities and version numbers in the plan, and confirm that the name spelling is the same as the same record in the application form |
| Expert review opinions | The review conclusion, expert list, review date, and signatures must be complete and align with the application milestone | Check the date of the opinion signature and the signatures, and confirm there is no conflict with the application date on the application form |
| Reply limit | The length of a single answer matches the answer length required by the page, and the ending of long answers is complete | In application settings, check the switch and slider position, ask a question that requires a long answer and look at the ending, and observe changes in single-use consumption together with maxResponse, maxContext, and quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name spelling and credit count of the same program do not match across two materials. Cause: the materials were revised separately, and no cross-material field comparison was performed.
- Symptom: the cultivation plan version was not synchronized, and the old course structure is still used. Cause: after revision, the archived copy was not replaced, and the version number and date were not updated.
- Symptom: expert review opinions lack signatures or receipts, and the review date is misaligned with the application date. Cause: at filing time, the signature block and signature column were not checked, and the receipt was not kept with the document.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the ending is complete, and confirm that the length of a single answer matches the page requirement.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives a source that can be pointed back to, and check the tokens of the quoted text and the number of array entries and record them separately.
- In application settings, check the reply limit switch and slider position, and use
maxResponseto observe the length of a single answer. - Compare names, quantities, dates, and signatures across materials, confirm that entries can point back to the original text, and separately record the number of quoted entries and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget.