What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management involves three types of materials: training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. The training plan includes course setup, credit requirements, advisor comments, and a signature field; the proposal report includes the basis for topic selection, schedule, review conclusion, and signature; the mid-term assessment form includes ideological and moral character, course grades, research progress, and signatures from the advisor and assessment panel. Materials enter in batches according to semester milestones: the training plan is formulated after enrollment, the proposal report is submitted during the topic selection stage, and the mid-term assessment form is filled out during the mid-term review. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three must correspond item by item, and the name, quantity, and date of the same record must remain consistent when queried across materials. After materials enter this function, the training plan assumes the role of the basis for courses and credits, the proposal report assumes the role of the basis for topic selection and progress, and the mid-term assessment form assumes the role of the basis for stage conclusions and signatures; during queries, each points back to the corresponding original text entry.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are then completed by the model. The response limit is controlled by a slider to set the length of a single answer; if set too low, the answer will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | The course name, credit quantity, formulation date, and advisor signature must be consistent with the corresponding records in the proposal report and mid-term assessment form, and the version must be current | In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that the single-answer length matches the page requirements |
| Proposal report | The topic name, schedule, review conclusion, and signature must match item by item with the training plan and mid-term assessment form, and no signature or receipt may be missing | Ask a cross-material basis question that requires a long answer, see whether the answer gives a source that can be pointed back to, and check whether the ending is complete |
| Mid-term assessment form | The dates for ideological and moral character, course grades, and research progress, as well as the assessment panel signature, must be consistent with the training plan and proposal report, and the version must be synchronized | Compare usage from two runs, confirm the change in single-run usage after adjusting the limit, and check that the tokens of the quoted text and the number of array entries are recorded separately |
| maxResponse | The single-answer length matches the answer length required by the page, and truncation behavior and run consumption can be verified | In application settings, check the switch and slider position, and confirm that the values of maxContext, quoteMaxToken, and maxResponse are consistent with the page requirements |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same course name is written differently in the training plan and the mid-term assessment form, and the quantities do not match. Cause: Materials enter in batches by semester, and naming and statistical criteria were not checked uniformly.
- Phenomenon: The proposal report cites an old version of the training plan, and the dates and credit requirements have changed. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the current version did not replace the old material.
- Phenomenon: The mid-term assessment form lacks the advisor signature or receipt, and the conclusion field is blank. Cause: When the materials were submitted, the signature and receipt fields were not checked item by item, so the basis entries cannot point back to the original text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, confirm that the response limit matches the answer length required by the page, and check the maxResponse value.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives a source that can be pointed back to, and confirm that the number of quoted entries and quoteMaxToken are recorded separately.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, confirm that the single-answer length matches the page requirements, and compare usage from two runs.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form item by item, and confirm that the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent and that the version is current.