What this category's data looks like
Filing materials for specialty settings in vocational colleges usually include a specialty setting filing form, a talent demand justification, and a list of faculty and equipment. The filing form records the specialty name, code, program length, enrollment scale, and signatures and seals; the talent demand justification records industry positions, survey dates, and justification conclusions; the faculty and equipment list records the number of teachers, professional titles, equipment names, and the number of units/sets. Materials are updated by academic year or application batch, and the version is based on the signature and seal date. After entering the model integration and configuration stage, the filing form is used to answer questions about specialty names and codes, the talent demand justification is used to answer questions about the reasons for setting up the specialty and the survey time, and the faculty and equipment list is used to answer questions about the conditions for running the program; together, the three support evidence items that can be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The "evidence items that can be traced back to the original text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the retrieval stage must bind an indexing model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Specialty setting filing form | Fields include specialty name, code, program length, enrollment scale, and signature; the date and seal must be consistent with the application batch | Check the fields and signature/seal date in the form, and check whether the specialty name and code match across the two materials for the same specialty |
| Talent demand justification | Fields include positions, survey date, justification conclusion, and signature; the version must be the current batch | Check the survey date and signed receipt, and confirm that the justification conclusion is consistent with the specialty direction in the filing form |
| Faculty and equipment list | Fields include the number of teachers, professional titles, equipment names, and the number of units/sets; the quantities and dates must be traceable | Check the quantities and dates in the list, and check whether they are consistent with the conditions for running the program reported in the filing form |
| Model binding relationship | The language model, indexing model, and reranking model correspond to the stages; the model identifier is consistent with the channel return | Check the channel configuration and key source, compare with the model name returned by the channel, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or code of the same specialty does not match between the filing form and the justification materials. Cause: The two materials were filled out by different personnel, no cross-check was performed, and the versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: The quantities in the faculty and equipment list are inconsistent with the quantities reported in the filing form. Cause: After the list was updated, it was not written back to the filing form, and dates and signatures are missing.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error or authentication failure. Cause: The model type bound at the retrieval stage is inconsistent with the channel, and the source of the channel key is incorrect.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to their corresponding stages respectively, and record the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken.
Business test: ask a cross-material evidence question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, compare with the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment list, and check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent and whether the version is current.