What this category's data looks like
This page addresses modern apprenticeship and order class management scenarios. The materials include three types: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and mentor apprenticeship records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements state the cooperating entities, positions, and terms; order class training plans state the courses, number of people, and assessments; mentor apprenticeship records state the mentoring mentor, apprentice, date, and signature. When these three types of materials enter the model access and configuration stage, each plays a different role: cooperation agreements and training plans are used to generate basis entries that can be traced back to the original text, while apprenticeship records are used to verify process traces and signature receipts. The material source is the school's academic affairs and school-enterprise cooperation archives, and the update rhythm changes with the semester and agreement cycle. The field characteristics are four types: name, quantity, date, and signature. During cross-material comparison, the name, quantity, and date of the same record in two materials often do not match, versions are not synchronized, or signature receipts are missing, so each item must be checked against the current version and the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting the model binding relationships and channel responses. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five types: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types. The retrieval stage must bind an indexing model, and the dialogue stage must bind a language model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Model type | Corresponds to the stage to be used | In the model configuration, check the type label, and confirm that the retrieval stage binds an indexing model and the dialogue stage binds a language model |
| Channel and key | Consistent with the connected service | Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that calls can succeed and do not change the material reading scope |
| Model identifier | Consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Compare with the model name returned by the channel, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken and the quoted text budget |
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement and order class training plan | Name, quantity, date, and signature match the current version | Compare item by item the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same apprenticeship record do not match between the training plan and the apprenticeship record. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, and fields are not synchronized according to the current version.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error. Cause: The retrieval stage is bound to a language model, and an indexing model is not bound according to the stage correspondence.
- Symptom: The answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: The model identifier is inconsistent with the name listed in the documentation, and the model name returned by the channel has not been checked.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm it is consistent with the name listed in the documentation, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken; the number of quoted entries is the array length, and quoteMaxToken is the quoted content budget. The two are not compared for equality. If a quote upper limit is involved, check the tokens of the quoted text, and record the array count separately.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and check that the source points to the institution’s materials, the version is current, and the entries match the original text.
- In the model configuration, check the model type labels item by item, and confirm that the retrieval stage binds an indexing model and the dialogue stage binds a language model.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the channel key only affects whether calls can succeed, and does not determine whether personnel can read knowledge base materials.