What this category's data looks like
This page is aimed at the vocational college skills competition organization scenario, and the materials cover three categories: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations are usually published by the organizer by competition year and include the event name, group, date, and signature field; registration forms are filled in by participating schools and include contestant names, ID numbers, coaches, and stamped receipts; training plans are updated on a rolling basis by the coaching team and include week number, item, duration, and signature confirmation. After these three types of materials enter parsing and training tasks, each plays a different role: the regulations serve as the judgment baseline, the registration form serves as the source of personnel and qualifications, and the training plan serves as the process record. In terms of update cadence, regulations change with the competition year, registration forms are revised multiple times within the registration window, and training plans iterate weekly. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. When the same record is compared across materials, inconsistent name spellings, different date conventions, and missing signatures or receipts easily occur, requiring basis entries that can point back to the original text to support replies to parents or written plans.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is completed, parsed chunks are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier; the index flows through three states, and data pending indexing does not participate in recall.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Event name, group, date, signature field are consistent with the current version | Check the regulation publication date and version number, compare whether the signature field is complete, and confirm that entries can point back to the original paragraphs |
| Registration form | Contestant names, quantities, and coaches match the regulation requirements, and the receipt is stamped | Check names and quantities item by item, inspect the receipt stamp, and confirm that fields are consistent with the regulation conventions |
| Training plan | Week number, item, duration, and signature confirmation are traceable | Check the correspondence between week numbers and items, inspect the coach signature, and confirm that the date convention does not conflict with the regulations |
| Data rows and index status | Is in one of the three states parsed / indexing / indexed and is consistent with the interface display | Open the data row to check the status, and inspect the processing modes corresponding to chunkSize, chunkSplitter, and trainingType |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or quantity of the same contestant does not match across two materials. Cause: The registration form and training plan are maintained separately, field conventions are not unified, and cross-material comparison lacks entries that point back to the original text.
- Symptom: The regulations have already changed versions, but the registration form is still filled in according to the old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, the materials were not checked against the current version after entering parsing, and the entries point to the old version of the original text.
- Symptom: The training plan lacks a coach signature or the registration form lacks a receipt. Cause: The signature and receipt steps are not closed-loop; after parsing is persisted, the data row is visible, but the basis entries cannot point back to the complete original text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: upload one material, observe the data row status transitions and the coverage of the rebuild task, confirm that the status transitions among parsed, indexing, and indexed, and that rebuild covers only data rows whose indexing has been completed.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer provides traceable sources, and check that the number of citations and the citation text tokens are recorded separately.
- Open the data row to check whether the status is consistent with the interface display, separately check the identifiers of the file record and the data row, and confirm the processing modes corresponding to
chunkSize,chunkSplitter, andtrainingType. - View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, confirm that it targets only data whose indexing has been completed, that data pending indexing does not participate in the rebuild chain, and that failed training data can be directly edited or deleted.