What this category's data looks like
Common materials for occupational skill level certification social evaluation include the evaluation implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form. The evaluation implementation plan provides the certification occupation, level, time, and test site arrangements; the candidate registration form records candidate identity, application conditions, and contact information; the assessor dispatch form records assessor names, qualifications, and dispatch dates. Materials are updated monthly or by batch, and fields commonly include names, quantities, dates, and signature fields. When entering the model integration and configuration function, the evaluation implementation plan serves as the basis source, while the candidate registration form and assessor dispatch form serve as supporting materials, bound respectively to the dialogue and retrieval stages, so that when replying to parents or writing into the plan, the original text can be referenced.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Basis entries that can reference the original text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. During configuration, bind the corresponding model type according to the stage, and verify the channel and key source.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | Check the occupation name, level, date, and signature field in the plan, confirm that the version is current and that entries can reference the original text | Compare the name, date, and signature item by item against the original plan, record the number of cited entries and the tokens of the cited text, and check the quoteMaxToken budget |
| Candidate registration form | Check the candidate name, application conditions, date, and receipt in the registration form, and confirm consistency with the batch information in the plan | Compare the registration form with the plan item by item, separately mark entries where the name, quantity, or date do not match, and check whether maxContext and maxTokens are sufficient for reading |
| Assessor dispatch form | Check the assessor name, qualification, dispatch date, and signature in the dispatch form, and confirm consistency with the assessment arrangements in the plan | Cross-compare the dispatch form with the plan and registration form, separately record entries missing signatures or receipts, and check the value of toolChoice in the retrieval stage |
| Model type | Check that the five model types—language, indexed, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the usage stages, and that type labels match the stages | Check the type labels in the model configuration, and check the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name is written differently in the registration form and the plan. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, and no unified name verification was performed.
- Phenomenon: The dispatch form date does not match the plan batch date. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, and old materials are still in use.
- Phenomenon: The registration form is missing a receipt or the plan is missing a signature. Cause: Signatures and receipts were not fully collected during the material circulation stage.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexed model are bound to the corresponding stages respectively, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, and see whether the answer provides a referenceable source.
- Check the model type labels by stage, check the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the channel and key source are consistent.
- Compare the evaluation implementation plan, candidate registration form, and assessor dispatch form item by item for name, quantity, date, and signature, mark inconsistent entries, and reference the original text.