What this category's data looks like
In the exam organization and violation handling scenario, the materials mainly include exam administration manuals, examination room record sheets, and violation fact records, with receipt and signature pages as attachments. The exam administration manual provides the process and handling standards, the examination room record sheet records the on-the-spot situation and time, and the violation fact record carries the factual description and determination opinion. After the materials enter the dialogue and retrieval, they serve respectively as the source of standards, the source of facts, and the source of determinations, and answers need to trace the basis items back to the specific materials and locations. Field characteristics are concentrated in candidate identifiers, subjects, time, names of violation circumstances, quantities, signature and receipt columns, and versions are distinguished by release date and revision records. The update rhythm changes with exam batches and process revisions, and old and new versions are often retained at the same time, so verification must be based on the current version.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The basis items that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The channel key only affects whether the call succeeds, and does not determine whether personnel can read the knowledge base materials.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Exam administration manual | Candidate identifiers, subjects, time, names of violation circumstances, and handling standards must be aligned item by item with the examination room record sheet and violation fact record, and the version is determined to be current by release date and revision records | Take the same candidate and the same subject, compare the names and dates in the three materials, check whether signatures and receipts are complete, and record the tokens and array count of the quoted text |
| Examination room record sheet | The on-the-spot time, names of violation circumstances, and quantities are consistent with the exam administration manual and violation fact record, and the signature column and receipt column must not be blank | Sort by time and extract records from the same session, compare field by field, trace missing signatures or receipts back to the original text items, and separately record the array count |
| Violation fact record | The factual description and determination opinion are consistent with the standards in the exam administration manual, the candidate identifiers and subjects match the examination room record sheet, and versions that are not synchronized are not used as a basis | Extract the same violation circumstance, compare the names and quantities in the two materials, and check the quoteMaxToken budget and the length of the quoted text |
| Model configuration | The five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the steps in which they are used, and the model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation | Check the type labels in the model configuration, compare them with the model names returned by the channel, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and toolChoice match the step |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names and quantities of the same violation circumstance do not match in the two materials. Cause: The entry standards are not unified, the materials are maintained separately, and when tracing back to the original text, the items point to different expressions.
- Symptom: The exam administration manual has been revised, but the examination room record sheet still uses the old wording. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, the old and new versions are retained at the same time, and the basis items fall into an invalid version.
- Symptom: The violation fact record lacks a signature or receipt, and the handling conclusion has no evidence. Cause: The signature and receipt collection were not completed on the spot, and the material is still cited as a basis after entering retrieval.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check that the model identifiers in the response are consistent with the type labels in the model configuration, and check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and toolChoice correspond to the step used.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and check and separately record the tokens and array count of the quoted text.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels of the five types of models and the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition are each bound to the corresponding step.
- Extract the exam administration manual, examination room record sheet, and violation fact record for the same candidate and the same subject, compare names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts item by item, and mark items whose versions are not synchronized.