What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the enterprise sales product training scenario, and the materials come from three categories: product manuals, response wording materials, and channel training schedules. Product manuals provide product parameters, version numbers, and applicable conditions; response wording materials provide commitment boundaries and frequently asked questions; channel training schedules provide course arrangements, instructors, and receipt records. The three material categories are updated according to version cadence: manuals change versions as products iterate, wording materials are adjusted according to compliance requirements, and schedules are arranged quarterly. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, version numbers, and signature fields. After materials enter parsing and training tasks, they are first parsed and chunked into data rows, then enter the three-state index flow, becoming a retrievable source of basis. After product manuals and wording materials enter, they assume the role of cross-checking parameters and wording; after schedules enter, they assume the role of verifying scheduling and signatures.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index states (parsed, indexing, indexed). Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are completed next by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is completed, parsed chunks are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier; the index flows through three states, data pending indexing does not participate in recall, and changing models only rebuilds data whose indexing has been completed.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Product manual | The manual version number is consistent with the current version, and the names, quantities, and dates referenced by the parameter pages and the wording materials match | Check the file records and data rows separately, confirm that the data row status is consistent with the interface display, and check whether the chunk boundaries corresponding to chunkSize and chunkSplitter cover the parameter table and version page |
| Response wording material | The commitment boundaries are consistent with the manual parameters; when the version is not synchronized, the current manual version prevails; the signature field is complete | Check the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the manual and the wording material, confirm that the processing mode corresponding to trainingType matches the wording entries, and view the data rows covered by the rebuild task |
| Channel training schedule | The schedule date, instructor, receipt, and signature are complete, and the course arrangement corresponds to the manual version | Check the file records and data rows separately, confirm that the schedule entry is in one of parsed, indexing, or indexed, and check whether entries missing signatures or receipts have been corrected |
Three common errors
- Symptom: materials that were just uploaded cannot be found. Cause: the data row is in a pending-indexing state, the three-state index flow has not yet reached completed, and the retrieval layer is naturally isolated and does not recall it.
- Symptom: the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in two materials do not match. Cause: the manual and wording material versions are not synchronized, and old-version entries have not been updated with the current version, causing basis entries to trace back to outdated original text.
- Symptom: empty data rows are left after training fails. Cause: parsing succeeded but indexing was not completed, the data row lacks vectors and an index, and entries missing signatures or receipts were not identified as pending correction.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: upload one material and observe the data row status flow and the coverage scope of the rebuild task. Confirm that data rows pass through parsed, indexing, and indexed in sequence, and that data pending indexing does not participate in recall; when changing models, only rebuild data whose indexing has been completed, and the initial training covers data that is pending indexing and indexing.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials and see whether the answer gives a traceable source. For example, ask whether the product manual and the response wording material express the same parameter consistently, check whether the answer gives basis entries that can be traced back to the original text, and verify that the number of citations and the tokens of the cited text are recorded separately.
- Open the data row to check the status, confirm that it is in one of parsed, indexing, or indexed and consistent with the interface display, and check the file records and data rows separately.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, confirm that only data whose indexing has been completed is covered; check the chunking and processing modes corresponding to
chunkSize,chunkSplitter, andtrainingType, and check entries missing signatures or receipts.