What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the business basis query scenario for self-funded overseas study application services. The materials mainly come from the study service contracts, school application forms, personal statements, and their attachments archived by this park. These materials enter the document parsing and chunking function in document form: the contract provides the contracting entity, service scope, and fee terms; the application form carries the school name, application batch, and date; the personal statement records version and signature information. The material update cadence follows the application season and supplementary document nodes. Common fields include party name, school name, quantity, amount, signing date, and receipt number. The same record may have inconsistent names, quantities, or dates across different materials. When versions are not synchronized or signatures and receipts are missing, basis entries need to point back to specific original text paragraphs.
Configuration and implementation checks
Parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks) only output data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). Basis entries that can point back to the original text must be handled by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is complete, parsed chunks are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier. The index transitions through three states, and data pending indexing does not participate in recall.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Study service contract | The party name, service scope, amount, and signing date must match the application form and personal statement, and it must be the current version with complete signatures and receipts | Open the contract data row, verify the field paragraphs cut under chunkSize and chunkSplitter, compare the signing date and receipt number, and confirm the status is parsed or indexed |
| School application form | The school name, application batch, quantity, and date must be consistent with the contract and personal statement. Entries missing signatures or receipts cannot be used as a basis | Verify the file record and data row separately, check the processing mode corresponding to trainingType, confirm the index status is indexing or indexed, and point back to the original text paragraph |
| Personal statement | The version number, submission date, and signature information must be synchronized with the contract and application form. The name and quantity of the same record must not conflict between the two materials | Check whether the data row status is one of parsed, indexing, or indexed, verify that the rebuild scope only covers data that has completed indexing, and record the tokens and array count of the referenced text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: newly uploaded materials cannot be found. Cause: after parsing is completed and persisted, they are in a pending-indexing state, and the retrieval layer naturally isolates them from recall, so you must wait for the index to transition to completed.
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between two materials. Cause: versions are not synchronized or signatures and receipts are missing, so the basis entry cannot point back to a unique original text paragraph.
- Symptom: empty data rows remain after training fails. Cause: interrupted training leaves orphan data, and the failed data rows must be directly edited or deleted to avoid mistakenly using them as a basis.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance check: upload one material and observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task. Verify whether the data row is bound to a unique data identifier, whether the status transitions through parsed, indexing, and indexed, and whether the rebuild task only covers data that has completed indexing; at the same time, record the data rows corresponding to the three parameters chunkSize, chunkSplitter, and trainingType.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a traceable source. For example, ask whether the contract and application form are consistent in date, name, and quantity, check whether the answer points to specific materials and paragraphs, and distinguish the tokens and array count of the referenced text.
- Open the data row to verify whether the status is consistent with the interface display, and confirm that the identities of the file record and the data row are distinguishable.
- Check the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that it only targets data that has completed indexing, while data pending indexing does not participate in the rebuild.