What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of the establishment and annual reports of Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions. Materials include the establishment application, cooperation agreement, articles of association, annual report statements, and receipts. The source is the current version submitted by the approving authority and the operating entity, and the update cadence is synchronized with the approval and annual report cycles. Field characteristics center on institution name, education level, enrollment number, signing date, and signature and seal. When entering the model access and configuration step, the establishment application and cooperation agreement enter the retrieval library as the basis source text, the articles of association and annual report statements participate in cross-material verification as comparison materials, and the receipts are used to confirm whether versions are synchronized. Each material has a different role: the application and agreement provide the original basis, the articles of association provide governance clauses, the annual report statements provide annual data, and the receipts provide proof of delivery and version.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Basis items that can be traced back to the source text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types, and the type labels and the model names returned by the channel must be checked in the model configuration.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Fields, dates, and signatures must correspond item by item with the cooperation agreement and articles of association; the name and quantity must not differ in two places | Check the institution name, enrollment number, signing date, and signature and seal in the application, and compare them with the cooperation agreement and articles of association; check that the model identifier returned by the channel is consistent with the name listed in the document |
| Cooperation agreement | The version must be currently valid, with signatories, date, and receipt complete; missing signature or receipt is regarded as not synchronized | Check the agreement version number and effective date, and confirm that the receipt exists; check that the quoted content budget quoteMaxToken and the number of quoted items are recorded separately, and do not compare the array item count with the budget for equality |
| Articles of association | The name, quantity, and date in the clauses must be consistent with the application and annual report statements; unsynchronized versions must be marked | Check the corresponding fields between the articles of association clauses and the application and annual report statements; check whether maxContext and maxTokens meet the needs of cross-material comparison, and whether toolChoice is set according to the step |
| Annual report statements | The annual data and the same record in the application and cooperation agreement must not mismatch in name, quantity, or date | Check the institution name, enrollment number, and signing date in the annual report statements, and compare them item by item with the application and agreement; when retrieval reports an indexing model-related error, first check the indexing model type label |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the institution name, enrollment number, or signing date of the same record does not match between the application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: the two materials were updated separately, and no item-by-item cross-material comparison was performed.
- Symptom: the version of the articles of association or annual report statements is not synchronized, and old clauses and old annual data are still cited. Cause: after the version update, they were not re-entered into the retrieval library, and the receipt is missing.
- Symptom: retrieval reports an indexing model-related error or authentication failure, and the answer style changes abruptly after switching models. Cause: the indexing model type label does not match the step, or the channel key is inconsistent with the connected service.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to the corresponding steps respectively, and check that the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken and the number of quoted items are recorded separately.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and whether the source can be traced back to the original text items in the establishment application, cooperation agreement, articles of association, or annual report statements.
- In the model configuration, check the type labels of the five model categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and confirm that they correspond to the steps to be used.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the model name returned by the channel is consistent with the name listed in the document, and check whether the receipts and signatures are complete.