What this category's data looks like
The materials for general college entrance examination registration qualification review are mainly the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrating parents. The sources are candidate submission, school preliminary review, and examination and enrollment agency re-review, and the update rhythm rolls with registration batches and correction notices. After materials enter the document parsing and chunking stage, their roles differ: the college entrance examination registration form is responsible for candidate identity and examination category fields, the household registration and student status certificates are responsible for household registration address, continuity of student status, school attended, and start and end dates, and the materials for children accompanying migrating parents are responsible for the guardian's residence permit, social insurance contributions, stable residence, and receipt signature. In terms of field characteristics, dates, names, quantities, signatures, and receipts are the key points for cross-material comparison. If the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match across two materials, the version is not synchronized, or a signature or receipt is missing, the basis entry cannot point back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index statuses (parsed, indexing, indexed). "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are completed next by retrieval and subsequent processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| College entrance examination registration form | Fields, dates, and signatures can match the original text, and the basis comes from the institution’s materials and the version is current | Check the candidate name, examination category, household registration address, signature, and receipt date, check whether the data row status is parsed or indexed, and confirm that the chunk boundaries of chunkSize and chunkSplitter have not truncated key fields |
| Household registration and student status certificates | The name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials, and the versions are synchronized | Compare the household registration address, the start and end dates of student status continuity, and the school name attended, view the processing mode corresponding to trainingType, and confirm that data rows in indexing do not participate in recall |
| Materials for children accompanying migrating parents | The guardian's residence permit, social insurance contributions, stable residence, and receipt signature are complete and can point back | Check the residence permit number, number of social insurance months, residence address, and receipt signature, check whether the identities of the file record and the data row are distinguishable, and whether the rebuild task covers only indexed data |
| Index status | It is in one of the three states parsed, indexing, or indexed and is consistent with the interface display | Open the data row to check the status, confirm that data pending indexing is isolated at the retrieval layer, and that changing the model rebuilds only indexed data |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name or number of social insurance months does not match across two materials, and the basis entry cannot point back to the original text. Cause: The field definitions of the college entrance examination registration form and the materials for children accompanying migrating parents are not unified, and dates and quantities are not compared item by item.
- Phenomenon: The version of the household registration and student status certificates is not synchronized, and the old address or student status start and end dates are still referenced. Cause: After material correction, parsing and chunking were not redone, and the data row still points to the old version content.
- Phenomenon: The materials for children accompanying migrating parents lack a signature or receipt, and although the basis entry can be retrieved, it cannot serve as valid evidence. Cause: Successful parsing does not mean retrieval will definitely hit, and the signature and receipt fields are not included in verification.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: upload one material and observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task; confirm that the status passes through parsed, indexing, and indexed in sequence, that rebuild covers only indexed data, that initial training covers data pending indexing and data being indexed, and check whether chunkSize, chunkSplitter, trainingType, the file record, and the data row identifier are distinguishable.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a source that can point back.
- Open the data row to check whether the status is consistent with the interface display, and confirm that the identities of the file record and the data row are distinguishable.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that it targets only data that has completed indexing, and that data pending indexing does not participate in recall.