What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the general college entrance examination registration qualification review scenario, with materials drawn from three categories: the examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers. The registration form carries the candidate's basic information and examination category; the household registration and student status certificates carry the household registration address, student status start and end dates, and school seal; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers carry the residence permit, social insurance contributions, and guardian relationship. When these three categories of materials enter the model integration and configuration function, each plays a different role: the registration form is used to compare name, ID number, and registration location; the household registration and student status certificates are used to verify the household registration move-in date and continuity of student status; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers are used to verify the residence and social insurance time limits. The update cadence changes with the enrollment year and provincial notices, and the field characteristics are concentrated in name, certificate number, date, quantity, signature, and receipt. The name, quantity, and date of the same record often do not match across two materials, and version desynchronization and missing signatures or receipts are also common, so basis entries must be able to point back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Basis entries that can point back to the original text" are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types; the retrieval step needs to bind an indexing model, and the reranking step needs to bind a reranking model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Examination registration form | Check whether name, certificate number, examination category, and registration location are consistent with the household registration and student status certificates, and whether the date and signature fields are complete | Compare field by field against the original text, record inconsistencies, and point back to the page number or entry |
| Household registration and student status certificates | Check the household registration move-in date, student status start and end dates, and school seal, and determine whether the version is current | Compare against the current version, check the seal and receipt, and confirm that the date chain is continuous |
| Materials for children accompanying migrant workers | Check the residence permit, social insurance contributions, and guardian relationship, and whether names and quantities match across the two materials | Compare names, quantities, and dates across materials, and mark items missing signatures or receipts |
| Model binding relationships | Language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition respectively correspond to the steps to be used, and the model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation | Check the type annotations in the model configuration, compare against the model names returned by the channel, and check maxContext, maxTokens, and toolChoice |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name or certificate number is written differently in the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates. Cause: the two materials were entered at different times, and field alignment and verification by pointing back to the original text were not performed.
- Symptom: the household registration move-in date or the number of months of social insurance contributions does not match across the two materials. Cause: versions were not synchronized, the old version of the material was still hit by retrieval, and the current version was not marked.
- Symptom: the materials for children accompanying migrant workers are missing the guardian's signature or the school receipt. Cause: the material circulation step did not collect them completely, and they were still cited as complete basis during retrieval.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check whether the model identifiers in the response are consistent with the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that language, indexing, and reranking are each bound to the corresponding step; for the citation limit, see quoteMaxToken, record the number of citation entries separately, and do not compare the array length with quoteMaxToken for equality.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials and see whether the answer gives a citable source, for example a date or name difference involving both the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates.
- In the model configuration, check the type annotations and the model names returned by the channel, and confirm that language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition are each bound to the corresponding step.
- Check the three categories of materials item by item for name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt, mark items with unsynchronized versions, and ensure that basis entries can point back to the original text.