What this category's data looks like
The materials for general higher education institution admissions and enrollment filing mainly come from the admissions plans and filing rules published by provincial admissions and examination institutions, as well as the admission rosters of higher education institutions. The admissions plan contains fields such as institution major groups, planned numbers, selected examination subjects, tuition fees, and school location; the filing rules contain clauses such as the filing ratio, tie-breaking ranking, batches, and preference settings; the admission roster contains the candidate number, name, score, major, and admission status, and carries dates and signatures. Materials are updated by batch and year, and within the same batch the current version prevails. When entering this function, the admissions plan and filing rules are split and indexed as basis texts for retrieval and citation; the admission roster serves as the object of verification, used to refer back to the original entries. The three have different roles, and after a retrieval hit it must be possible to refer back to the fields, dates, and signatures in the original text, avoiding mismatches in names, quantities, and dates between the two materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. "Basis entries that can refer back to the original text" are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Channel keys only affect whether the call succeeds, and do not determine whether personnel can read knowledge base materials; configuring the model well does not mean the business data permissions are configured well.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the current version, and the planned numbers and major group names can be traced back to the original text | In the model configuration, check the index model type annotation; check the channel configuration and key source; against the model name returned by the channel, confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the document |
| Filing rules | The clause version is the current one, and the filing ratio and tie-breaking ranking can be traced back to the original clauses | Check whether the index model and rerank model used for retrieval are bound according to the link; check whether maxContext and maxTokens cover the clause length; quoteMaxToken only constrains the citation content budget |
| Admission roster | The candidate number, name, score, major, and admission status are consistent in names, quantities, and dates between the two materials, and signatures or receipts are complete | Check the language model binding relationship; after a retrieval hit, refer back to the original entries and compare dates and signatures item by item; the number of cited entries is recorded separately by array length, and is not compared for equality with quoteMaxToken |
| Model type | Corresponds to the link to be used, and the type annotation can be checked in the model configuration | Check the five types of bindings: language, index, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition; after changing models, check whether the answer style changes abruptly |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or score of the same candidate does not match between the two materials. Cause: The versions of the admissions plan and admission roster are not synchronized, and retrieval hits old-version entries.
- Symptom: The filing ratio or planned number is inconsistent in quantity between the two materials. Cause: The materials are updated at different paces, and the index is not rebuilt with the current version.
- Symptom: The admission roster lacks signatures or receipts. Cause: Material archiving is incomplete, and dates and signatures cannot be verified when referring back to the original text.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm it is consistent with the name listed in the document, and check the configuration attribution of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, and see whether the answer gives a citable source, and whether the source can be traced back to the original entries of the admissions plan, filing rules, or admission roster.
- In the model configuration, check item by item the model type annotations and bound links, and confirm that language, index, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition each take their proper place.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the dates and signatures of the current-version materials are complete.