What this category's data looks like
When the organization of college admissions physical examinations processes physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and notices of restricted majors, the materials enter the knowledge base retrieval service by batch. Physical examination forms record the candidate's basic information, past medical history, examination conclusions for each subject, and the chief examiner's opinion; re-examination applications record the reason for application, the original examination items, the re-examination items, and the approval signature; notices of restricted majors record the name of the restricted major, the clause serving as the basis for the restriction, and the receipt confirmation from the candidate or parent. The three types of materials come from different sources: physical examination forms are issued by the physical examination station, re-examination applications are accepted by the admissions office, and notices of restricted majors are generated by the admissions office based on the admissions charter and the physical examination conclusions. The update rhythm advances with admissions batches; during physical examination season materials are ingested in a concentrated manner, and re-examinations and notices are completed before admission. In terms of field characteristics, the three materials share the candidate number, name, date, and signature fields, but item names, quantities, and conclusion wording often differ because of different templates, so entries that can be traced back to the original text must be taken as authoritative.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), which outputs candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields must include candidate number, name, physical examination date, conclusions for each subject, and chief examiner signature, and must be consistent with the current version | In the retrieval node, use searchMode to switch among semantic, full-text, and hybrid, and check whether the matched physical examination form chunks carry the candidate number and signature field |
| Re-examination application | The reason for application, original examination items, re-examination items, and approval signature must be complete, and the date must be later than the original examination date | Retrieve once each with two phrasings of the same question, compare the number of candidate entries and the similarity score, and confirm that the re-examination application chunks can be traced back to the original text |
| Notice of restricted majors | The name of the restricted major, the clause serving as the basis for the restriction, and the receipt signature must match, and the receipt must not be missing | Compare the ranking of the top few entries before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether the notice chunks retain the original text of the clause serving as the basis for the restriction |
| Quoted content budget | The number of quoted entries is the array length, limit controls the number of entries, and the tokens of the quoted text are recorded separately | Record the number of entries in the returned array separately, then check whether the tokens of the quoted text exceed the budget; do not compare the two for equality |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate number has mismatched name or item quantities between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: the two materials are entered at different stages, and the template fields are not aligned, so the original text must be traced back and checked item by item.
- Symptom: the admissions charter clause cited in the notice of restricted majors is inconsistent with the current version. Cause: after the charter was updated, the notice template was not synchronized, and retrieval matched an old-version chunk, so the version and effective date must be checked.
- Symptom: the re-examination application lacks an approval signature or the notice of restricted majors lacks a receipt. Cause: during material circulation, the signature page was not returned, so the ingested chunk is incomplete, and the signature field and receipt field must be checked.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare the number of candidate entries and the similarity score, then toggle usingReRank on and off to see whether the ranking of the top few entries changes.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, and see whether the answer provides a traceable source and whether the source matches the original text of the physical examination form, re-examination application, or notice of restricted majors.
- In the knowledge base search test, use
searchModeto run semantic, full-text, and hybrid separately, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and confirm that cross-material questions can recall the corresponding chunks. - Check the candidate number, date, and signature field of the matched chunks, confirm that the tokens of the quoted text are within budget, and record the array length separately; do not compare the number of entries with the budget for equality.