What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on three core types of materials in adult college entrance examination registration and admission management: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms record candidates' basic information and application preferences, care bonus-point materials state bonus-point items and review opinions, and admission rosters summarize admission results and batch information. The three types of materials come respectively from admissions examination institutions, registration confirmation points, and admitting institutions, and are updated in batches by registration season, review period, and admission period. In terms of field characteristics, registration forms contain name, ID number, application level, and signature field; care bonus-point materials contain bonus-point type, certificate number, reviewer signature, and date; admission rosters contain candidate number, admitting institution, major, batch, and admission date. When materials enter this function, the registration form serves as the retrieval entry point, care bonus-point materials serve as the source for basis verification, and the admission roster serves as the basis for result confirmation. The three must form basis entries that can refer back to the original text in dialogue and retrieval, supporting replies to parents or being written into proposals.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The "basis entries that can refer back to the original text" are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Fields must include name, ID number, application level, and signature field; date and signature are complete, and the same record's name, quantity, and date are consistent with those in the care bonus-point materials and admission roster | Check whether the candidate number, name, and application level in the registration form and admission roster correspond item by item; check whether signatures and receipts are missing; check the indexing model type label in the model configuration to confirm that retrieval uses this model |
| Care bonus-point materials | The bonus-point type, certificate number, reviewer signature, and date must be consistent with the registration form; the version is current, with no missing signature or receipt | Compare against the bonus-point application record in the registration form, and check whether the name, quantity, and date match; check the reviewer signature and date; confirm that the reranking model type label corresponds to the retrieval step |
| Admission roster | The candidate number, admitting institution, major, batch, and admission date must form a closed loop with the registration form and care bonus-point materials; versions are synchronized, with no unsynchronized old versions | Compare the candidate number, name, and batch in the admission roster and registration form item by item; check the admission date and signature; check in the model configuration that the language model identifier is consistent with the model name returned by the channel |
| Model binding relationships and channel responses | The model type corresponds to the step to be used; the channel and key are consistent with the integrated service; the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the documentation | Check the channel configuration and key source; compare against the model name returned by the channel; check whether maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the quoted content budget; record the number of quoted entries, and do not compare it for equality with quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name and date of the same candidate do not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: the two materials are entered in different steps, versions are not synchronized, and cross-material verification is lacking.
- Symptom: care bonus-point materials lack a reviewer signature or receipt. Cause: the review process is not closed-loop, and the signature field is not verified when materials are archived, so basis entries cannot refer back to the original text.
- Symptom: retrieval reports indexing model-related errors or authentication failures. Cause: the model type does not match the step, the channel key is inconsistent with the integrated service, and the answer style changes abruptly after switching models.
How to verify the setup
Function acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, and check the model identifier in the response; confirm that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken match the quoted content budget, and record the number of quoted entries separately, without comparing it for equality with quoteMaxToken.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer provides a source that can be referred back to; the source must point to the original text entries in the registration form, care bonus-point materials, or admission roster.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the registration form, care bonus-point materials, and admission roster, and compare item by item whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent.
- Check the model type labels, channel and key sources, and model identifiers in the model configuration, and confirm that they are consistent with the names listed in the documentation.