What this category's data looks like
Materials for the research project task statement signing scenario include the project task statement, the subject task breakdown table, and the budget statement. The task statement provides the project name, undertaking unit, start and end dates, and signature field; the breakdown table provides the subject name, person in charge, task milestones, and budget subjects; the budget statement provides funding subjects, amounts, preparation date, and approval signature. When these three types of materials enter the model access and configuration function, the task statement and breakdown table serve as sources of basis entries, and the budget statement serves as a source for verifying quantities and dates. The update rhythm follows the progress of the signing process, with common supplementary signing, revisions, and version replacements. Field characteristics fall into five categories: name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt. The same record may be expressed differently across materials, and each item must be traced back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexed, rerank, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Project task statement | Fields include project name, undertaking unit, start and end dates, and signature field, and must be aligned item by item with the breakdown table and budget statement | Check the name, dates, and signature against the original text, and record traceable locations |
| Subject task breakdown table | Fields include subject name, person in charge, task milestones, and budget subjects, and must be consistent with the task statement and budget statement | Check the subject name and quantity, and mark the version and receipt status |
| Budget statement | Fields include funding subjects, amounts, preparation date, and approval signature, and must correspond to the task statement and breakdown table | Check the amounts and dates, and verify whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Model configuration | The model type corresponds to the step in which it is to be used, and the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation | Check the type label in the model configuration, and compare it with the model name returned by the channel |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same project name is written differently in the task statement and the breakdown table. Cause: the two materials were prepared separately, without name alignment and traceback verification.
- Phenomenon: the amount in the budget statement does not match the quantity in the breakdown table. Cause: versions were not synchronized, and after revision only one material was updated.
- Phenomenon: the task statement lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: the signing process was not completed, and the material entered the retrieval scope in advance.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and the indexed model are bound correctly respectively, and check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and toolChoice in the channel response.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, and see whether the answer gives a traceable source.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the model type corresponds to the step, and record the reference content budget of
quoteMaxToken. - Check the name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt for each material, mark the version, and ensure that entries can be traced back to the original text.