What this category's data looks like
This page addresses business basis queries in the investigation and handling of academic misconduct reports. Three types of materials enter this function: report materials, investigation reports, and expert appraisal opinions. Report materials provide leads and original statements, investigation reports present the investigation process and conclusions, and expert appraisal opinions provide professional judgment. Each of the three carries its own fields, dates, and signatures, and once they enter the model context they jointly support the generation of basis entries. The update cadence is synchronized with case progress, and the version in force is the currently effective one. Field characteristics include record name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt status; the same record may have mismatched name, quantity, or date across two materials, and when versions are not synchronized or signatures/receipts are missing, basis entries lose their ability to be traced back. The materials have different roles: report materials are the starting point, investigation reports are the process, and expert appraisal opinions are the professional support; none of the three can be missing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. "Basis entries that can be traced back to the original text" are then completed by the model. The response limit is controlled by a slider for the length of a single answer; if set too low, answers will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Report materials | Fields include reporter, reported person, time, matter, and signature/receipt; if the date does not match the investigation report, the basis entry cannot be traced back | In application settings, check maxResponse and quoteMaxToken, and compare the name, quantity, date, and signature of the report materials and the investigation report |
| Investigation report | The version must be the currently effective one; the record name, quantity, and date must be consistent with the expert appraisal opinion, and if the signature or receipt is missing, the entry is unusable | Check the investigation report version number and effective date, verify whether the signature and receipt are complete, and record the number of cited entries and the quoteMaxToken budget |
| Expert appraisal opinion | The appraisal conclusion, date, and signature must correspond to the investigation report; when the name or quantity of the same record is inconsistent, the source of the discrepancy must be noted | Compare the fields of the expert appraisal opinion and the investigation report, check the maxContext accommodation range, and confirm that the cited text tokens and the number of array entries are recorded separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same record has mismatched name, quantity, or date in the report materials and the investigation report. Cause: the versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and cross-checking was not performed when the fields were entered.
- Phenomenon: the expert appraisal opinion lacks a signature or receipt, and the basis entry cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: the material circulation step did not complete sign-off, and the currently effective version does not cover the old draft.
- Phenomenon: the answer breaks off in the middle of a sentence, and the basis entry is not given completely. Cause: the response limit slider is set too low, and the length of a single answer is truncated prematurely.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance check: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and confirm that the response limit matches the answer length required by the page.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials, see whether the answer gives a traceable source, and check that the number of cited entries and the quoteMaxToken budget are recorded separately.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and compare the usage changes between two runs.
- Check the fields, dates, and signatures of the report materials, investigation report, and expert appraisal opinion, and note version differences.