What this category's data looks like
This page's category is journal three-review three-proof and editorial quality, and the materials include three types: three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records. Three-review forms record the fields, dates, and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review; proofs carry layout and text revision traces; proofreading records register the name, count, date, and receipt of each proof round. Materials enter the knowledge base in batches by review round and proof round, and the update cadence follows version changes and supplementary signed receipts. After entering the retrieval function, three-review forms take on the role of review-round basis, proofs take on the role of text and layout basis, and proofreading records take on the role of proof-round and signature basis; together the three support cross-material basis queries.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). Basis items that can be traced back to the source text are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | Fields, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the current version | In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode and check whether the dates and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review are complete |
| Proof | Layout and text revision traces must match the source paragraphs | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and check whether the proof snippets retain key revision traces |
| Proofreading record | The name, count, date, and receipt of each proof round must align with the three-review form and the proof | Record the number of candidate items and the similarity score, and check whether the name, count, and date of the same record are consistent across the two materials |
| Quoted content | After trimming, key source snippets are still retained, and the number of items is related to limit | Record the number of items in the quote array separately, check the tokens of the quoted text, and do not compare the number of items with the quote budget as equal |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, count, and date of the same record do not match between the three-review form and the proofreading record. Cause: the two materials were entered without being aligned to the same version.
- Symptom: the proof has already changed version, but retrieval still recalls snippets from the old version. Cause: the version was not synchronized, and the old material was not taken down or marked invalid.
- Symptom: the three-review form lacks a signature or the proofreading record lacks a receipt, so the basis item cannot be traced back. Cause: signatures and receipts were not archived into the knowledge base.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and similarity scores, then toggle usingReRank on and off to see the top few rankings.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a traceable source.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, record the number of candidate items and the score, and confirm that semantic and full-text results have both been merged. - Check the number of items in the quote array and the tokens of the quoted text, and confirm that key snippets of the three-review form, proof, and proofreading record are still retained after trimming.