What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the journal three-review three-proof and editorial quality scenario, and the materials include three types: three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records. Three-review forms record the fields, dates, and signatures of the initial review, re-review, and final review; proofs carry layout and text modification traces; proofreading records register proofreading rounds, errors, and receipts. Materials enter in batches according to the editorial process, and the update rhythm stays in sync with version circulation, with fields structured around name, quantity, date, and signature. After entering the retrieval service, three-review forms and proofreading records provide the textual source of the business basis, proofs provide the comparison source for layout and modifications, and together the three support the back-reference of basis entries.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the reranking model in the retrieval service, which outputs the sorted candidates and reranking scores. The basis entries that can back-reference the original text are then completed by citation trimming and answer generation. Hybrid retrieval simultaneously runs the vector and full-text paths and merges the results; after merging, the scope is large and similarity filtering cannot be applied directly, so the reranking model is usually used again to sort and filter by reranking score.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are complete and consistent with the current version | Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the initial review, re-review, and final review, and compare whether signatures or receipts are missing; in the search parameters, check the two-path switches of searchMode and the binding status of usingReRank, and record the number of candidates and the scores |
| Proof | Whether the layout and text modifications match the three-review form and proofreading records | Check whether the same record is consistent in name, quantity, and date, and confirm the version has been synchronized; compare the order and scores before and after reranking, and check whether the similarity filter is executed by reranking score |
| Proofreading record | Whether the proofreading rounds, errors, and receipts are complete and can be back-referenced | Check the proofreading rounds and error entries, and confirm the receipts and signatures are complete; use limit to control the number of candidates, record the tokens of the cited text separately, and do not compare the array length with this for equality |
| Reranking model | Bound and used for sorting and filtering | Compare the order and scores of the top three before and after reranking, confirm the candidates come from both paths, and check whether there are many candidates but the top few are irrelevant |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the three-review form and the proofreading record. Cause: the two materials are entered separately, without cross-material field comparison and receipt verification.
- Symptom: the proof version is inconsistent with the current version, and the basis entry points to the old version. Cause: the version is not synchronized, the update rhythm is disconnected from the editorial process, and signatures or receipts are missing.
- Symptom: there are many candidates but the top few are irrelevant, and similarity filtering appears to fail. Cause: after merging, the scope is large, filtering is not performed by reranking score, and the results are clearly biased toward keyword hits.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: compare the order and scores of the top three before and after enabling reranking, confirm the candidates come from both paths, and check the filtering effect of usingReRank and similarity.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question, see whether the answer gives a back-referenceable source, and check whether the source matches the original text of the three-review form, proof, and proofreading record.
- In the search parameters, check the two-path switches of
searchModeand the binding status ofusingReRank, and record the number of candidates and the scores. - Use
limitto control the number of candidates, record the tokens of the cited text separately, and do not compare the array length with this for equality.