What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on compliance materials for journal publication licenses and annual verification, covering three types: journal publication licenses, annual verification forms, and rectification reports. The materials come from the license issuance and annual verification submission process, and the update cadence is synchronized with the annual verification cycle and rectification receipts. Field characteristics center on license number, journal name, sponsoring organization, verification year, signatures, and receipt dates. When the materials enter this feature, the license and verification form serve as the basis source and version comparison object respectively, while the rectification report serves as supplementary basis and receipt evidence. Together, the three types of materials support the traceability of basis entries, making it easy to trace back to the original text when replying to parents or writing it into a plan.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is performed by the reranking model in the retrieval service, which outputs the sorted candidates and rerank scores. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are then completed by citation trimming and answer generation. Hybrid retrieval runs both vector and full-text paths and merges the results; after merging, the scope is large and similarity filtering cannot be applied directly, so the reranking model is usually used again to sort and filter by rerank score.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | The license number, journal name, sponsoring organization, and validity period fields must match the annual verification form item by item | Check the license number and journal name fields, confirm that dates and signatures are complete, and check whether the two materials are the same version |
| Annual verification form | The verification year, journal name, quantity, and date fields must be consistent with the license and rectification report | Compare the journal name, quantity, and date of the annual verification form and the license, and confirm that signatures and receipts are not missing |
| Rectification report | The rectification items, receipt date, and signature fields must correspond to the annual verification form | Check the receipt date and signature of the rectification report, and confirm that it is synchronized with the version of the annual verification form |
| Reranking model output | The number of candidates and rerank scores can be distinguished, and the top few are relevant to the basis question | Compare the number of candidates and scores before and after reranking, and confirm that the values of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit match the current retrieval path |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same journal name is written differently in the two materials. Cause: The license and annual verification form were not updated in sync, so the name, quantity, or date do not match.
- Symptom: The receipt date of the rectification report is inconsistent with the verification form. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and the old material is still retrieved and participates in ranking.
- Symptom: The basis entry lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The material archiving is incomplete, and the signature and receipt fields were not completed along with the annual verification cycle.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: compare the order and scores of the top three before and after reranking, check whether the number of candidates and rerank scores can be distinguished, and confirm that the values of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit match the current retrieval path.
Business test: ask a cross-material basis question and see whether the answer gives a traceable source; the number of citations is the array length, and the tokens of the cited text are recorded separately and are not compared for equality with quoteMaxToken.
- Check the journal name, quantity, date, and signature fields of the license, annual verification form, and rectification report, and mark records that do not match.
- Compare the number of candidates and scores before and after reranking, confirm that the top few are relevant to the basis question, and record the number of citations and the tokens of the cited text.