What this category's data looks like
Academic journal operation cooperation management involves three types of materials: operation cooperation agreements, advertising review forms, and distribution cooperation materials. An operation cooperation agreement contains the partner name, revenue-sharing terms, signing date, and signatures of both parties; an advertising review form contains the advertiser, publication number, review date, and reviewer signature; distribution cooperation materials contain distribution channels, quantities, start and end dates, and receipts. Materials are updated quarterly, and the currently effective version prevails. When entering workflow orchestration, the operation cooperation agreement serves as the primary basis, while the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials serve as cross-verification sources, each providing fields, dates, and signature information for comparison when subsequent nodes continue execution along branches.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The basis entries that can be traced back to the original text are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution along branches.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Operation cooperation agreement | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and match the advertising review form and distribution cooperation materials | Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, reference variables, and run a trial |
| Advertising review form | Advertiser, publication number, review date, and reviewer signature are consistent with the operation cooperation agreement | Trigger a node once and check the node status and nodeId in the run record |
| Distribution cooperation materials | Distribution channels, quantities, start and end dates, and receipts are consistent with the operation cooperation agreement | Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial once |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | Check options and branch connections, and inspect nodeId and interaction state records |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the operation cooperation agreement and the distribution cooperation materials. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without cross-verification.
- Symptom: The version of the advertising review form is not synchronized, and it still references the publication number and date of an old version of the operation cooperation agreement. Cause: The currently effective material was not replaced after the version update.
- Symptom: The distribution cooperation materials lack a signature or receipt and cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: The signing and receipt archiving were not completed during the material circulation process.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: run a trial for each option one by one, check the branch directions and interaction states in the run records, and confirm that variables, nodeId, and the selection result variable have been correctly passed.
Business test: ask a basis question that spans materials and see whether the answer provides a traceable source.
- Run a trial for each option one by one, check the branch directions and interaction states in the run records, and confirm that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes.
- Compare the operation cooperation agreement, advertising review form, and distribution cooperation materials item by item for fields, dates, and signatures, mark inconsistencies, and trace them back to the original text.