What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on materials for kindergarten safety protection and emergency drills: daily safety inspection ledgers, hazard rectification notices, emergency drill plans and sign-in sheets, access control and school bus inspection records, and responsibility statement signature pages. The sources are the kindergarten safety officer, logistics staff, and class teachers, updated on a weekly inspection, monthly drill, and semester summary rhythm. Fields include hazard item name, rectification deadline, number of drill participants, sign-in date, inspection item number, and responsible person's signature. When entering this function, the ledger and plan serve as objects to be verified, the sign-in sheet and inspection records serve as comparison benchmarks, and the responsibility statement serves as the signature basis. Workflow nodes trigger interaction states based on user selections and record branch directions for subsequent nodes to continue execution.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "discrepancy list" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Hazard rectification notice | The hazard item and rectification deadline have consistent names, quantities, and dates in both materials | Compare the ledger hazard items with the notice one by one, reference nodeId to locate the source node, mark unclosed items, and record the branch direction |
| Emergency drill sign-in sheet | The number of drill participants and sign-in date are consistent with the plan | Verify the planned number of participants against the actual number of attendees on the sign-in sheet, reference variables to backfill discrepancy fields, and trigger the user selection branch |
| Access control and school bus inspection records | No inspection items are missing and each corresponds item by item with the checklist | Compare item by item according to inspection item numbers; missing items enter an interaction state awaiting selection, and the interaction state is recorded for review |
| Responsibility statement signature page | The responsible person's signature is consistent with the responsible person in the ledger | Compare the signature name with the responsible person in the ledger; items with missing signatures are marked through branching, and an interaction state record is output |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The hazard rectification deadline has passed, but the ledger still shows it as unclosed. Cause: The rectification notice was not written back, and the node branch did not continue execution according to the selection result.
- Symptom: The number of drill sign-ins does not match the planned number in the plan. Cause: After the sign-in sheet was updated, it was not re-compared, and the discrepancy fields were not marked.
- Symptom: Missing access control or school bus inspection items were not discovered. Cause: The inspection records did not correspond item by item, and the interaction state record did not cover all options.
How to verify the setup
In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger once, and view the node status in the run record.
In a subsequent node, reference the selection result variable and run a trial once to confirm that the process continues downward after the interaction is completed.
- This function's acceptance: trial-run each option one by one, check the branch directions and interaction states in the run record, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and reference
nodeIdandvariablesin subsequent nodes to verify that the selection result variable has been passed. - Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, hand them to the reviewer for confirmation, and write back.