What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on the vocational college program setup filing scenario. Material sources include the program setup filing forms submitted by institutions, the talent demand justification issued by industry enterprises, and the on-campus faculty and equipment lists. These materials are updated by academic year or application batch, and the fields cover program name, enrollment quantity, justification date, signatures and seals, and receipt number. When entering the material verification and discrepancy localization function, the filing form serves as the baseline ledger, the talent demand justification provides the external basis, and the faculty and equipment list supports verification of the conditions for running the program. The three types of materials together form a multi-source comparison set for the same record, used to locate inconsistencies in name, quantity, date, signature, and version.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The "discrepancy list" is then completed by the model. The response limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer. If set too low, the answer will be truncated; if set too high, consumption will increase. The model answers accordingly, and entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | The program name, enrollment quantity, filing date, signatures and seals, and receipt number must be aligned item by item with the ledger | Check the program name, quantity, and date in the filing form against the ledger; check whether signatures and receipts are complete; use maxResponse to confirm the end of long-form output |
| Talent demand justification | The justification date, demand quantity, and program name must remain consistent with the same record in the filing form | Compare the name, quantity, and date in the justification against the filing form; record discrepant fields; record the number of citations separately, and quoteMaxToken only verifies the tokens of the quoted text |
| Faculty and equipment list | The number of faculty, number of equipment units, date, and signatures must correspond to the filing form and justification | Check the quantity, date, and signatures in the list against the filing form; check whether versions are synchronized; use maxContext to confirm the range of context that can be accommodated |
| Version and receipt records | The version number and receipt status of the same record in the two materials must be consistent | Check the version number and receipt number; mark unsynchronized versions; confirm items missing signatures or receipts |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same program has different name spellings in the two materials, and the quantity and date also do not match. Cause: The filing form and justification were filled out by different handlers, and field-level alignment was not performed.
- Symptom: The faculty and equipment list has been updated, but the filing form still references the old version, and the receipt number is missing. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and there was no unified write-back in the material circulation process.
- Symptom: The talent demand justification has a signature, but the filing form lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The collection pace of signatures and receipts was inconsistent, and no item-by-item check was performed before review.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; if it cuts off in the middle of a sentence, raise the response limit slider and retry.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, mark discrepancies in name, quantity, date, or signature, and submit them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position to confirm that the single-answer length matches the page requirements.
- Compare usage across two runs to confirm the change in single-run usage after adjusting the limit, and check whether the endings of longer answers are complete.