What this category's data looks like
This category's data looks like this: Material verification and discrepancy location for vocational college skills competition organization involves three core types of materials: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations come from the official text released by the organizer and are updated with competition event notices, containing fields such as event name, group, date, and signature column; registration forms are submitted by each participating team and are updated with registration deadlines and supplementary registration nodes, containing contestant name, ID number, competition item, number of people, and team leader signature; training plans are filled in by instructors and updated weekly or by stage, containing training date, class hours, venue, and instructor signature. When these three types of materials enter this function, competition regulations serve as the baseline ledger, while registration forms and training plans serve as the objects to be verified, used for field-by-field comparison of whether names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts are consistent, and for locating discrepancy fields.
Configuration and implementation checks
Configuration and implementation checks: This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. The model judges whether to call the tool this time based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable values in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the event name, group, competition date, and signature column are consistent with the registration form | Open the original regulations, verify the name, date, and signature page item by item, and record inconsistent fields in the discrepancy list |
| Registration form | Whether contestant name, competition item, number of people, and team leader signature are consistent with the regulations and training plan | Compare name, quantity, date, and signature receipt record by record, and mark missing or conflicting items |
| Training plan | Whether training date, class hours, venue, and instructor signature are synchronized with the registration form and regulations | Verify the plan version and update date, check whether signatures or receipts are complete, and locate unsynchronized fields |
| Tool calling node | Whether the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required correspond to the material fields | Verify the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas, and check whether the toolChoice and functionCall related configurations point to the target tool |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same contestant's name or number of people does not match between the registration form and the training plan. Cause: The two materials are filled in by different roles, lacking unified field mapping and version synchronization.
- Symptom: The competition regulations have been updated, but the registration form still uses the old date or old group. Cause: The version is not synchronized, the material update rhythm is inconsistent, and no version comparison step is set.
- Symptom: The training plan lacks the instructor's signature or receipt but still enters the summary. Cause: The signature column is not validated as a required field, and a receipt verification step is missing.
How to verify the setup
How to verify the setup: Acceptance of this function: run a trial with a question missing required parameters, check the input parameters and return in the call record, confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the introduction, and check whether toolChoice and functionCall are triggered as expected.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, and record the name, quantity, date, and signature items in the discrepancy list.
- Open each tool parameter configuration one by one, verify the two items of parameter introduction and whether required, and confirm they correspond to the material fields.
- Run a trial with a record missing the signature field, and observe whether the model asks a follow-up question first instead of directly fabricating values.