What this category's data looks like
The material verification and discrepancy localization for social evaluation of vocational skill level certification revolves around three types of materials: the evaluation implementation plan, the candidate registration form, and the assessor dispatch form. The evaluation implementation plan comes from the evaluation institution, is released by batch, and contains the occupation name, level, assessment modules, date, and signature/seal; the candidate registration form is filled in by candidates and consolidated by the institution, and contains name, ID number, declared occupation and level, and years of work experience; the assessor dispatch form is generated after the institution schedules the assessment, and contains the assessor's name, certificate number, dispatched session, and signature. When the three types of materials enter the same verification process, the implementation plan serves as the baseline, while the registration form and dispatch form serve as the comparison objects; field by field, discrepancies in names, quantities, and dates are located to form a discrepancy list, which is submitted to the reviewer for confirmation and then written back to the ledger. The material update rhythm advances by batch: the registration form is updated as registration closes, the dispatch form is updated as assessment scheduling is adjusted, and the implementation plan is generally fixed after the batch starts. Field characteristics are mainly text, dates, quantities, and signatures, with mixed handwritten and printed content, and identifiers such as version numbers and receipt numbers.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The "discrepancy list" is then completed by the model. The response limit is controlled by a slider to set the length of a single answer; if set too low, the answer will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | Compare with the candidate registration form to see whether the occupation name, level, and assessment date are consistent, and check the signature/seal and version number | In application settings, check the position of the maxResponse slider to confirm that a long list can be output completely |
| Candidate registration form | Compare with the assessor dispatch form to check the candidate name, declared level, number of sessions, and date, and inspect the signature and receipt | Record the quoteMaxToken budget, check the tokens of the quoted text, and record the number of array entries separately |
| Assessor dispatch form | Compare with the evaluation implementation plan to check the assessor certificate number, dispatched session, date, and signature, and locate missing signatures or unsynchronized versions | Ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and check the maxContext range |
| Discrepancy list | For the same object in the two materials, the name, quantity, and date are consistent; missing signatures or receipts are marked separately | Submit to the reviewer for confirmation and write back, and use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same candidate's name is written differently in the registration form and the dispatch form. Cause: the field format was not unified during entry, and the versions of the two materials were not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: the assessment date does not match between the implementation plan and the registration form. Cause: after batch adjustment, only one material was updated, and the receipt was not written back.
- Phenomenon: the assessor dispatch form lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: after assessment scheduling, the confirmation process was not completed, and the signature step was skipped.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: ask a question that requires a long answer, see whether the ending is complete, and confirm that the response limit matches the answer length required by the page.
Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, record the discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position to confirm that they match the answer length required by the page.
- Compare usage between two runs, check the change in single-run usage after adjusting the limit, and avoid answer length clearly exceeding what is needed.