What this category's data looks like
The application materials for social evaluation of vocational skill level certification include the evaluation implementation plan, candidate registration forms, assessor dispatch forms, and supporting ledgers. The materials are aggregated by the evaluation institution on a batch basis and are updated on a rolling schedule along with registration, exam scheduling, and dispatch rhythms; the fields are mainly name, ID number, occupation (trade), level, number of people, date, signature, and receipt. When entering this function, the evaluation implementation plan plays the role of the rule baseline, the candidate registration forms play the role of personnel facts, the assessor dispatch forms play the role of assessment resources, and the ledgers play the role of comparison reference. The four types of materials have inconsistent field definitions and are prone to version misalignment, so a tool calling node must first retrieve structured results before handing them to subsequent steps to locate discrepancies.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The three items of tool description, parameter description, and whether it is required determine whether the model initiates a call this time.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation implementation plan | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures are consistent with the ledger | Check the occupation (trade), level, evaluation date, and approval signature in the plan against the ledger item by item; check whether the description field of the tool calling node states the purpose and return result, and confirm that what is retrieved in the call record is the original text of the plan, not a paraphrase |
| Candidate registration form | Whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match the ledger | Extract registration form records by name and ID number, and compare occupation (trade), level, application date, and number of people; run a test with a question missing a required parameter to see whether the model asks a follow-up question or directly calls according to the description, and check whether the return contains values that do not exist in the materials |
| Assessor dispatch form | Whether the dispatch date, number of assessors, and signature receipt are complete | Check the assessor names, dispatch date, number of people, and signature receipt in the dispatch form; check whether the parameter description and whether it is required correspond to the material fields, and confirm that after multiple tools are chained, the results do not cross-contaminate each other |
| Tool calling node connection | Whether the diamond interface is already connected to the target tool | Check the diamond connection and node status on the canvas to confirm the call chain is reachable; check the behavior of toolChoice and functionCall in the call record, and confirm that the model did not skip the tool and answer directly |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name, quantity, and date do not match between the registration form and the ledger. Cause: the two material versions are not synchronized, the field definitions are inconsistent, and the model answers directly without calling the tool.
- Symptom: values that do not exist in the business materials appear in the returned result. Cause: when parameters have no required constraint, the model fabricates parameter values on its own, and the call record cannot be traced back to the original materials.
- Symptom: the dispatch form lacks a signature or receipt, and the dates in the plan and ledger are misaligned. Cause: the materials are updated at different rhythms, and after multiple tools are chained, the results cross-contaminate each other, so the discrepancy is not located.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: run a test with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check toolChoice, functionCall, and the tokens of the quoted text, and record the array length separately.
Business test: use one real record to find a field inconsistent with the ledger, hand it to the reviewer for confirmation, and write it back.
- Open the parameter configuration one by one, check the description and whether it is required, and confirm they correspond to the material fields.
- Check the diamond connection and node status on the canvas, and confirm that the tool calling node is already connected to the target tool.