What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of reviewing registration for professional and technical personnel qualification examinations. The materials come from three categories: registration forms, academic qualification certificates, and work experience certificates. They are submitted by applicants, issued by employers or archival institutions, and updated on a rolling batch basis. The registration form contains name, ID number, examination subjects, employer, date, and signature; the academic qualification certificate contains school, major, level, graduation date, and certificate number; the work experience certificate contains position, start and end dates, cumulative years, handler signature, and receipt. After these three categories of materials enter the material verification and discrepancy localization function, the registration form serves as the primary record, while the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate serve as comparison sources. They are aligned item by item by field, date, and signature, and a discrepancy list is output for the reviewer to confirm and write back.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The discrepancy list is then completed by the model, while entry and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Name, ID number, examination subjects, employer, date, and signature are consistent across the three materials | Use the registration form as the primary record, compare it field by field against the academic qualification certificate and work experience certificate, mark differences in names, quantities, and dates; check the setting locations of maxResponse and maxContext |
| Academic qualification certificate | School, major, level, graduation date, and certificate number are consistent with what is filled in on the registration form | Compare the graduation date with the education field on the registration form, check whether the version is synchronized and whether the signature and receipt are complete, and record inconsistent fields |
| Work experience certificate | Position, start and end dates, cumulative years, and handler signature are consistent with the registration form | Check the start and end dates and cumulative years, check for missing signatures or receipts, and output discrepancy list entries |
| Discrepancy list | The name, quantity, and date of the same object are consistent in the two materials | Submit to the reviewer for confirmation and write back; for quoted text, check tokens according to quoteMaxToken, and record the number of quotations separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The start and end dates of the same record do not match between the registration form and the work experience certificate. Cause: The two materials were filled in at different times, the versions were not synchronized, and no write-back was performed according to the primary record.
- Phenomenon: The academic qualification certificate lacks the handler signature or receipt, while the registration form has a signature field. Cause: Items were missed during the material collection stage, and signatures and receipts were not checked item by item.
- Phenomenon: The answer is cut off in the middle of a sentence, and discrepancy list entries are missing. Cause: The response limit is set too low; you need to look at the actual ending of the answer before adjusting it.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance check: ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; at the same time, check the setting locations of maxResponse and maxContext to confirm the length of a single answer and the range of context.
Business test: use a real record to find fields that are inconsistent with the ledger, write them as discrepancy list entries, and submit them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position to confirm that the length of a single answer and the range of context match the page requirements.
- Check the discrepancy list item by item for names, quantities, dates, and signatures, and after confirming version synchronization, write back to the ledger.