What this category's data looks like
In the continuing education credit hour recognition scenario, three types of materials—course filing forms, study certificates, and credit hour recognition forms—enter the verification process in sequence. The course filing form is submitted by the training institution before the course starts, and its fields include course name, number of class hours, teaching dates, and signature of the person in charge; the study certificate is obtained by the learner after completing the study, and its fields include study start and end dates, actual credit hours, and institution seal; the credit hour recognition form is filled out by the employer or the competent authority, and its fields include recognized credit hours, recognition date, and signature of the handler. The three types of materials have different update rhythms: the filing form is revised as the course plan is adjusted, study certificates are issued in batches, and recognition forms are summarized according to the application cycle. When entering this function, the filing form and the study certificate serve as comparison sources, and the recognition form serves as the object to be verified; together, the three support the consistency judgment of the name, quantity, and date of the same record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The discrepancy list is then completed by the model, and the entry point and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Course filing form | The course name, number of class hours, teaching dates, and signature field must be aligned item by item with the study certificate | Read the fields of the filing form, compare the name, quantity, and date with the record of the same name in the study certificate, and record the discrepant fields |
| Study certificate | The study start and end dates, actual credit hours, and institution seal must be consistent with the filing form and the recognition form | Extract the dates and credit hours from the study certificate, cross-check them with the filing form and the recognition form, and mark inconsistent items |
| Credit hour recognition form | The recognized credit hours, recognition date, and handler signature must match the filing form and the study certificate | Compare the fields of the recognition form with the other two materials, and output a discrepancy list of name, quantity, and date |
| Context range | The total amount of material fields that can be accommodated in a single answer is constrained by maxContext and maxResponse | Check the position of the response limit slider in the application settings, confirm that quoteMaxToken is the quoted content budget, and record the number of array items separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The number of class hours for the same course is inconsistent between the filing form and the study certificate. Cause: The versions are not synchronized; after the filing form is revised, the study certificate still uses the old version of the data.
- Phenomenon: The recognition form lacks the handler signature or receipt. Cause: The material circulation step has not been completed for receipt, resulting in a blank signature field.
- Phenomenon: The start and end dates of the study certificate do not match the teaching dates of the filing form. Cause: The two materials were filled out by different personnel, and the date standards were not unified.
How to verify the setup
This function acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the ending is complete, and confirm that the response limit slider setting matches the required answer length.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, submit the discrepancy list to the reviewer for confirmation, and write it back.
- In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that the single-answer length and context range meet the needs of material verification.
- Compare the usage of two runs to confirm the change in single-run usage after the limit adjustment, avoiding answers that break off in the middle of a sentence or are significantly longer than needed.