What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the corporate new-hire onboarding training scenario, with materials drawn from three categories: onboarding training plans, course sign-in sheets, and job descriptions. Onboarding training plans are issued by batch and contain course name, planned date, participants, and a signature field for the person in charge; course sign-in sheets are collected by session and contain trainee name, sign-in date, course name, and personal signature; job descriptions are updated by position version and contain position name, department, effective date, and approval signature. When the three material categories enter this feature, each plays a different role: the onboarding training plan serves as the baseline ledger, the course sign-in sheet serves as the process record, and the job description serves as the source of position definitions. Field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature; the update cadence rolls with batches, sessions, and position versions, and the same record must be compared field by field across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which determine the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The "discrepancy list" is then completed by the model. The response limit is controlled by a slider that sets the length of a single answer; if set too low, the answer will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Onboarding training plan | Whether course name, planned date, participants, and signature of the person in charge are complete | In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and use maxResponse to observe whether the end of a long answer is complete |
| Course sign-in sheet | Whether trainee name, sign-in date, course name, and personal signature are consistent with the plan | Compare the name, quantity, and date fields of the same record, record the number of discrepancies, use quoteMaxToken to check the tokens of the quoted text against the quote budget, and record the array item count separately |
| Job description | Whether position name, department, effective date, and approval signature are consistent with the ledger | Check whether the version is synchronized, confirm entries missing signatures or receipts, and use maxContext to check the range of context that can be accommodated |
| Discrepancy list | Whether the three field categories of name, quantity, and date are aligned item by item and written back | After confirmation by the reviewer, write back, retaining the original materials and discrepancy records |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name or date of the same trainee does not match between the onboarding training plan and the course sign-in sheet. Cause: the two materials are entered separately without field-level comparison, and discrepancies are only exposed at the summary stage.
- Symptom: the job description has been updated to a new version, but the onboarding training plan still references the old position definition. Cause: versions are not synchronized, the material update cadences are inconsistent, and the ledger is not refreshed with the position version.
- Symptom: the course sign-in sheet lacks a personal signature or receipt, and the discrepancy list cannot be closed. Cause: signatures are missed during the collection step, the reviewer cannot confirm attendance records, and write-back lacks a basis.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; if the answer breaks off mid-sentence, increase the response limit and retry, confirming the ending is complete before recording.
Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, check name, quantity, date, and signature item by item, form a discrepancy list, and submit it to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- In application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, ask a question that requires a long answer to see whether the ending is complete, and compare the usage changes between the two runs.
- Compare the onboarding training plan, course sign-in sheet, and job description field by field for name, quantity, date, and signature, record the number of discrepancies, and submit them to the reviewer for confirmation before write-back.