What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on three types of materials for corporate compliance and safety training: compliance training courseware, safety operating procedures, and exam records. Courseware is mostly updated by the compliance department annually or in response to regulatory changes, and includes system names, training dates, and instructor signature fields; operating procedures are issued by the safety department by equipment or process, and include step numbers, quantities, version numbers, and approval signatures; exam records are generated by the training organizer by session, and include candidate names, scores, dates, and receipt signatures. When these three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, courseware and procedures are recalled as evidentiary fragments, and exam records are recalled as result fragments, jointly supporting verification of the name, quantity, date, and signature of the same object across two materials, and providing candidate fragments for discrepancy localization.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit truncation). The "discrepancy list" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | The name, training date, and signature field of the same training object are consistent across the two materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, check the candidate fragments and scores, and record the name, date, and signature fields in the courseware |
| Safety operating procedures | The quantity, version number, approval date, and signature of the same process are consistent across the two materials | Turn usingReRank on and off to compare the ranking of the top few results, and check whether the quantity, version number, and approval signature in the procedure align with the ledger |
| Exam records | The name, score, exam date, and receipt signature of the same candidate are consistent across the two materials | Adjust similarity to observe changes in the number of candidate entries and scores, and check whether the name, date, and receipt in the exam record are missing |
| Knowledge base retrieval service | Candidate fragments and similarity scores are reproducible, and the number of citation entries and citation text tokens are recorded separately | Test once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, and separately record the array entry count and citation text tokens, without comparing the two as equal |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the courseware and the exam record. Cause: The two materials are maintained by different steps, field-level verification is not performed before entering retrieval, and candidate fragments are recalled independently.
- Symptom: The operating procedure version is not synchronized, and old-version step numbers are still recalled. Cause: After import into the knowledge base, replacement by version update is not performed, retrieval still hits old fragments, causing discrepancy localization to point to outdated content.
- Symptom: The exam record lacks a signature or receipt, and the courseware signature field is empty. Cause: The signature page was not completed when the materials were archived, retrieval can only return existing fragments, and missing fields cannot be automatically completed.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Test once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare candidate fragments and similarity scores, then turn rerank on and off to inspect the ranking of the top few results; switch searchMode to observe candidate changes, and adjust similarity to see the filtering effect.
Business test: Use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, record the name, quantity, date, and signature discrepancies of that record in the courseware, procedure, and exam record, form a discrepancy list for the reviewer to confirm and write back.
- In the knowledge base search test, retrieve the same record using semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes respectively, record the number of candidate entries and scores, and mark fields with inconsistent name, quantity, date, and signature.
- Retrieve once each with rerank on and off, compare the order of the top few candidates, separately record the number of citation array entries and citation text tokens, and submit the discrepancy items to the reviewer for confirmation before writing back to the ledger.