What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three types of materials: registration forms, care bonus point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms are filled in by candidates and preliminarily reviewed by registration points, with fields including name, ID number, application level, subject category, mailing address, and signature; care bonus point materials are submitted by candidates and verified by relevant departments, including certificate name, issuance date, number, and seal; admission rosters are generated by admitting institutions by batch, including candidate name, admitted major, admission date, and responsible person's signature. In terms of update cadence, registration forms are revised on a rolling basis with on-site confirmation, bonus point materials are collected by review batch, and admission rosters are finalized after the admission of each batch is completed. When the three types of materials enter the material verification and discrepancy localization workflow, the registration form serves as the baseline ledger, while the bonus point materials and admission rosters serve as the objects to be compared, verifying name, quantity, date, and signature field by field, locating discrepancies, and then handing them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "discrepancy list" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Whether the name, ID number, application level, and subject category in the registration form are consistent field by field with the bonus point materials and admission roster, and whether the signature and receipt are complete | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, reference variables to view field values, and record inconsistent fields and their locations |
| Care bonus point materials | Whether the bonus point certificate name, issuance date, and number correspond to the care items and dates filled in the registration form, and whether the seal is complete | Trigger a user selection, view the node status in the run record, compare the material date with the date filled in the registration form, and mark items whose versions are not synchronized |
| Admission roster | Whether the name, admitted major, and admission date in the admission roster are consistent with the registration form and bonus point materials, and whether the responsible person's signature is in place | Reference nodeId in a subsequent node to associate this variable and run a trial once, verify the name, quantity, and date of the roster against the ledger, and output the discrepancy fields |
| Discrepancy list | Whether the discrepancy list lists the object, field, values in the two materials, and discrepancy type item by item, and whether it is marked as pending review | Continue execution according to the branch to generate the list, hand it to the reviewer for confirmation, then write it back to the ledger, and retain the interaction status record for future reference |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name or ID number of the same candidate does not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: Each material was filled in independently during data entry, without using the registration form as the baseline for field-level comparison.
- Symptom: The issuance date of the bonus point material is inconsistent with the date filled in the registration form. Cause: The material version was not synchronized, and the corresponding field in the registration form was not written back after the review batch was updated.
- Symptom: The admission roster lacks the responsible person's signature or the registration form lacks a receipt. Cause: Signatures and receipts were not included in the verification items, and after the interaction was completed the process stopped without continuing verification.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run trials option by option, check the branch directions and interaction status in the run records, and confirm that variables have been passed to subsequent nodes, that nodeId corresponds to the correct node, and that options and branch connections match one by one.
Business test: use one real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, verify the name, quantity, date, and signature of the registration form, bonus point materials, and admission roster, and hand them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger a user selection, then view the node status in the run record, and confirm that execution continues according to the corresponding option after the interaction is completed.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, compare the name, quantity, date, and signature of the registration form, bonus point materials, and admission roster field by field, mark discrepancies, and hand them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.