What this category's data looks like
In the teacher qualification exam and certification scenario, the written and interview registration form, the Mandarin proficiency certificate, and the medical examination form are the three core materials. The registration form comes from the exam registration system and contains name, ID number, subjects registered, exam district, date, and signature; the Mandarin proficiency certificate is issued by the testing institution and contains certificate number, grade, test date, and issue date; the medical examination form is filled out by a designated hospital and contains the medical examination conclusion, date, and physician signature. When these three materials enter this feature, the registration form serves as the primary record, while the Mandarin proficiency certificate and the medical examination form serve as attachments to be verified, each taking on the role of field comparison and discrepancy localization. The material update rhythm is concentrated submission during registration season and rolling supplementary submission across certification batches; field characteristics are mainly dates, names, quantities, and signatures, and versions easily become out of sync due to supplementary submission or correction.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool call node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The discrepancy list is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required, the model determines whether to call the tool this time, and leaves the input parameters and return in the call record.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Written and interview registration form | Whether the name, quantity, date, and signature are consistent field by field with the ledger | Open the tool node to introduce the fields, check the parameter descriptions for name, exam district, subjects, and date, and check whether required corresponds to the registration form fields; run a trial with a question missing a required parameter and observe whether it asks a follow-up question first |
| Mandarin proficiency certificate | Whether the certificate number, grade, test date, and issue date are consistent with the registration form record | Open the parameter configuration one by one, check the three descriptions of number, grade, and date and whether they are required; check the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas, and confirm that the tool call node connection is already connected to the target tool |
| Medical examination form | Whether the medical examination conclusion, date, and physician signature are consistent with the ledger record | Run a trial with a question missing the signature or receipt field, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; check whether the returned result contains values that do not exist in the materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the registration form and the Mandarin proficiency certificate. Cause: The two materials are entered in different stages, the field definitions and update rhythms are inconsistent, and no field-by-field comparison was done.
- Symptom: The version of the medical examination form is not synchronized, and the old version is still referenced after supplementary submission. Cause: After the material is updated, re-verification is not triggered, the tool call node still executes with the old input parameters, and the returned result is disconnected from the latest material.
- Symptom: The registration form is missing a signature or receipt, but the call return still gives a complete conclusion. Cause: Marking a parameter as required does not guarantee that the model will ask a follow-up question; without prompt guidance, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run a trial with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check whether toolChoice, functionCall, and the tool description fields are readable, and whether the two items of parameter description and whether required correspond to the business material fields.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, check the name, quantity, date, and signature, record the discrepancy list, and hand it to the reviewer to confirm and write back.
- Open the parameter configuration one by one, check the two items of parameter description and whether required, and confirm that they correspond to fields that actually exist in the registration form, Mandarin proficiency certificate, and medical examination form.
- Check the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool call node connection is already connected to the target tool, and run a trial with a question missing a field to observe whether it asks a follow-up question first.