What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of signing research project task statements; the materials include the project task statement, the topic task breakdown table, and the budget statement. The project task statement is submitted by the lead unit at the signing stage, and its fields include project name, topic name, person in charge, start and end dates, total funding, and signatures and seals; the topic task breakdown table is filled in separately by each research group, and its fields include topic number, task name, undertaking unit, participants, and delivery milestones; the budget statement is consolidated by finance or the budget preparer, and its fields include subject name, amount, calculation basis, and approval signature. The three types of materials enter the verification process together before signing, and the update rhythm is resubmission after version iteration, with the version number and receipt date needing to be synchronized. When entering this function, the project task statement serves as the baseline object, while the topic task breakdown table and the budget statement serve as comparison objects, each retaining field-level provenance to facilitate discrepancy localization.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by application settings (response limit, etc.), which output the length of a single answer and the range of context that can be accommodated. The "discrepancy list" is then completed by the model. The response limit uses a slider to control the length of a single answer; if set too low, the answer will be truncated, and if set too high, consumption will increase.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Project task statement | Name, quantity, date, and signature are consistent in the signed version | Check whether the project name and topic name are consistent with the ledger; check whether the start and end dates, total funding, and signatures and seals are complete; use maxContext to record the range of context that can be accommodated |
| Topic task breakdown table | The name, quantity, and date of the same topic are consistent across the two materials | Compare topic number, task name, undertaking unit, and participants item by item; check whether the delivery milestones match the start and end dates of the project task statement; use maxResponse to record the length of a single answer |
| Budget statement | Subject name, amount, calculation basis, and approval signature are consistent | Check whether the subject name and amount are consistent with the ledger; check the calculation basis and approval signature receipt; use quoteMaxToken to record the quoted content budget, and verify the tokens of the quoted text separately |
| Discrepancy list | Field-level discrepancies are localized to the specific material and row | Group inconsistent items of name, quantity, and date by material source; mark unsynchronized versions and missing signatures or receipts; submit to the reviewer for confirmation and write back |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same topic do not match between the project task statement and the topic task breakdown table. Cause: The two materials are filled in by different roles, versions are not synchronized, and there is no unified ledger for comparison.
- Phenomenon: The subject amount in the budget statement is inconsistent with the total funding in the project task statement, and the signature column is blank. Cause: The budget statement version is not synchronized, and the approval signature or receipt was not submitted together with the version update.
- Phenomenon: The answer is cut off in the middle of a sentence, and the discrepancy list lists only half of the fields. Cause: The response limit slider is set too low, the length of a single answer is insufficient, and this is unrelated to the context range.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask a question that requires a long answer and see whether the ending is complete; if the ending is cut off in the middle of a sentence, raise the response limit slider and retry, and compare the usage of the two runs.
Business test: use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, record the differences in name, quantity, and date, and submit them to the reviewer for confirmation and write-back.
- In the application settings, check the response limit switch and slider position, and confirm that they match the answer length required by the page.
- Ask a question that requires a long answer, check whether the ending of the longer answer is complete, and compare the usage changes between the two runs.