What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the journal publication license and annual verification scenario; the materials include three types: the journal publication license, the annual verification form, and the rectification report. The journal publication license states the name, publication number, competent and sponsoring units, validity period, and issue date; the annual verification form is filled in by year with the name, publication number, publication quantity, verification date, and signature field; the rectification report records the issue items, rectification quantity, completion date, and receipt signature. The three types of materials come from different sources: the license is issued by the licensing authority, the annual verification form is filled in by the publishing unit, and the rectification report is submitted by the responsible department. In terms of update cadence, the license is updated upon renewal or change, the annual verification form is submitted annually, and the rectification report is formed by rectification batch. When the materials enter this feature, the license and the verification form serve as the comparison baseline, and the rectification report serves as the object to be verified; the fields of the three enter the tool calling node for cross-checking of names, quantities, dates, and signatures.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "discrepancy list" is then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The tool description, parameter description, and whether it is required together determine whether this call is made; the returned result only reflects the call input parameters and return, and does not directly generate business documents.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | Whether the name, publication number, validity period, and issue date are consistent with the annual verification form | Open the tool node description field and check whether the license field description can be understood on its own, then run a test query missing the publication number field to see whether it asks a follow-up question first; check whether the toolChoice value falls within the call record |
| Annual verification form | Whether the name, publication number, publication quantity, verification date, and signature are consistent with the license and the rectification report | Open the parameter configuration one by one and check whether the parameter description and whether it is required correspond to the verification form fields; run a test query missing the publication quantity to see whether the model fabricates a value |
| Rectification report | Whether the issue items, rectification quantity, completion date, and receipt signature are consistent with the ledger | Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas to confirm that functionCall is connected to the target tool; use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, and record the input parameters and return |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the license and the annual verification form. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and the tool call only retrieves the field value from one of them.
- Symptom: The rectification report lacks a signature or receipt, yet the call result still returns completed. Cause: The parameter description does not state that the signature and receipt are required, and the model calls directly according to the description.
- Symptom: Values that do not exist in the business materials appear in the returned result. Cause: When there are no required parameters, the model fabricates parameter values on its own, and the input parameters in the call record cannot correspond to the material fields.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a test query missing required parameters, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check the values of toolChoice and functionCall in the record.
Business test: Use a real record to find fields inconsistent with the ledger, compare the name, quantity, and date of the license, annual verification form, and rectification report item by item, mark the discrepant fields for the reviewer to confirm and write back.
- Open the parameter configuration one by one, check the parameter description and whether it is required, and confirm that they correspond to fields that actually exist in the business materials.
- Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool, then run a test query missing a field to observe whether it asks a follow-up question.