What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of question acceptance and missing-item follow-up for kindergarten game activity organization. The materials involved include observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity objectives, and reflection-to-next-week plans. The correspondence between observation records and area plans determines the judgment of activity objective achievement; material placement quantities are used to identify material shortages; reflection-to-next-week plans are used to detect plans that have not been updated. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval service, each serves as a candidate fragment source, participating in semantic or full-text recall, and after merging, re-ranking, filtering, and upper-limit truncation, forms the cited content. The update cadence is: observation records are added after each activity, area plans and material placement quantities are updated weekly, and reflection-to-next-week plans are summarized monthly. Field characteristics include activity name, area, objective, material name and quantity, observation points, reflection entries, and next-week adjustments. Acceptance records and the completed follow-up questions are generated by subsequent nodes or manually based on candidate fragments and similarity scores.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merging, re-ranking, filtering, and upper-limit truncation). Acceptance records and the completed follow-up questions are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records | Correspond to area plans, and activity objective achievement has a basis | In the search test, test once each with synonymous questions, check whether the candidate fragments cover the observation points and objective entries, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Material placement list | Material placement quantities match activity needs, and material shortages can be identified | Retrieve with questions about material names and quantities, compare candidate differences when searchMode is semantic, full-text, or hybrid, and see whether fragments with insufficient quantities are recalled |
| Reflection-to-next-week plan | Plans that have not been updated can be followed up on, and reflection entries enter the candidates | Retrieve with questions about reflections and next-week adjustments, compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, and check changes in similarity scores |
| Area plan | When objectives and observations do not match, missing-item follow-up can be triggered | Test with a question missing key information to see whether it first asks a follow-up question before answering; check the limit number of cited texts and content completeness |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same question cannot be recalled when rephrased. Cause: question optimization does not cover coreference resolution and expansion, or the retrieval mode does not match the material form.
- Symptom: there are many candidates, but the ones ranked at the top are all irrelevant. Cause: after multi-path merging, no re-ranking secondary sort is performed, or the similarity filtering threshold does not match the citation upper-limit truncation.
- Symptom: the answer lacks key paragraphs, and material shortages are not identified. Cause: material placement quantity fragments do not enter the candidates, or the correspondence between observation records and area plans has not been updated.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to inspect the ranking of the top few.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it first asks a follow-up question before answering.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand compare the number of candidates andsimilarityscores across the semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes. - Enable and disable
usingReRank, record changes in the order of the top few; separately record thelimitnumber, and check the tokens budget of the cited text.