What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of formulating talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges. The materials include talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. The talent cultivation program is the master outline, course standards support course setup, and the job competency analysis table provides the competency basis. The materials come from finalized documents of the academic affairs office, secondary colleges, and professional teaching and research offices, and are updated by academic year or by professional demonstration cycle. The fields involve program name, course name, class hours and credits, competency items, dates, and signatures. The same record may be inconsistent in name, quantity, and date between the program and the course standards, and cases of unsynchronized versions or missing signature receipts may also occur. When the three types of materials enter question intake, they respectively assume the roles of master outline positioning, course details, and competency mapping, for use in missing-item identification and follow-up questioning.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the reference historical message range and answer constraints. "Intake records and the questions to be completed" are then completed by the model.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | Whether the program name, course name, class hours and credits, dates, and signatures are consistent with the course standards | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second round can carry on the references from the first round |
| Course standards | Whether the course names, quantities, dates, and signatures match the talent cultivation program, and whether the versions are synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that after adjusting the turns, the run consumption changes accordingly |
| Job competency analysis table | Whether the competency items, corresponding courses, dates, and signatures are consistent with the talent cultivation program and course standards | Check whether the opening message is treated as prior context, and confirm the reference historical message range and answer constraints |
| Intake records and the questions to be completed | Whether missing items are identified and followed up, and whether the answers are based on materials | Ask a question missing key information, see whether it first follows up before answering, and then transfer it to the handling person |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the talent cultivation program and the course standards. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, versions are not synchronized, and field-by-field comparison is not performed during intake.
- Phenomenon: The job competency analysis table lacks a signature or receipt, and after follow-up it still answers directly. Cause: Missing-item identification does not cover the signature and receipt fields, and the answer constraints do not require follow-up questions first.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, and the response becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns are too large and bring in irrelevant content, or too small and cannot use the prior context, and the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries on the references from the first question; check the reference historical message range and answer constraints, and verify the values of chatId, messages, and variables in the intake records and the questions to be completed.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it first follows up before answering; after missing items are identified and followed up, the answer is based on materials, and then it is transferred to the handling person.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second round can correctly carry on the references from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that after adjusting the turns, the run consumption changes accordingly, and check that the opening message is not treated as prior context.