What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the vocational school student internship management scenario. The source materials are internship agreements, internship plans, and internship logs archived by the school's academic affairs and internship management departments, as well as enterprise receipts and signature pages. The update cadence follows the advancement of internship batches, typically supplemented weekly or monthly, and the field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature. When materials enter this feature, their roles differ: internship agreements and internship plans serve as the basis for intake, used to identify students, positions, start and end dates, and signature status; internship logs serve as process records, used to verify attendance, tasks, and date continuity; receipts and signature pages serve as closing evidence, used to determine whether the materials are complete. During question-answering intake, the tool calling node first reads these material fields, then determines missing items and generates follow-up questions. The final intake record and the completed follow-up question items are handed off to subsequent nodes or manual verification.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). The "intake record and completed follow-up question items" are then completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification. The model decides whether to call the tool this time based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Internship agreement | Whether the name, date, and signature are consistent with the internship plan; whether missing signatures or receipts are identified as missing items | Open the tool node description fields and check whether the agreement name, start and end dates, and signature page correspond in the parameter descriptions; run a test with a missing-signature question to see whether it asks a follow-up question first |
| Internship plan | Whether the position name, quantity, and date match the internship log; whether a follow-up question is triggered when the version is not synchronized | Open each parameter configuration and check the description and whether it is required; check that the diamond-shaped interface is connected to the target tool, and confirm the call records of functionCall and toolChoice |
| Internship log | Whether the attendance quantity and task dates are consistent with the agreement and plan; whether a follow-up question is asked when the name or quantity of the same record does not match across the two materials | Check the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas; run a test with a question missing key fields, and check whether the return result contains values that do not exist in the business materials |
| Intake record and completed follow-up question items | Whether missing items are identified and followed up on, and whether the answer is based on materials | Check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it is a follow-up question or a direct answer; confirm that the finished product is completed by a subsequent AI node or manual verification |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same student's name or position name does not match between the internship agreement and the internship plan. Cause: The two materials are entered separately, no field-level comparison is performed, and missing-item identification only looks at a single material.
- Symptom: The internship log dates are inconsistent with the start and end dates of the internship plan, and the version is not synchronized. Cause: The log was not updated after the plan was adjusted, the tool call retrieved fields from the old version, and the return result contains values that do not exist in the materials.
- Symptom: The internship agreement is missing a signature or receipt, but a direct answer is still given during intake. Cause: The signature field is not marked as required, the model does not call the tool, and it answers directly based on the context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run a test with a question missing required parameters, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check whether toolChoice and functionCall appear in the call record.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering; if it answers directly, check whether the parameters are required and whether the prompt guidance is adequate.
- Open the tool node description fields, check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, and confirm that it clearly states the purpose, when it should be used, and what result it returns.
- Open each parameter configuration and check the description and whether it is required; run a test with a question missing that field to see whether it asks a follow-up question first instead of fabricating directly.