What this category's data looks like
This page focuses on intake records and follow-up questions in modern apprenticeship and order class management, involving three types of materials: school-enterprise cooperation agreements, order class training plans, and master-apprentice mentoring records. School-enterprise cooperation agreements come from signed texts by both cooperating parties, updated by academic year or project cycle, with fields including partner name, major, number of people, start and end dates, and signature/seal positions; order class training plans come from the teaching management department, adjusted with the training cycle, with fields including class name, course modules, practical training arrangements, assessment methods, and approval signatures; master-apprentice mentoring records come from the mentoring process, reported weekly or monthly, with fields including master and apprentice names, position, mentoring content, date, and signatures or receipts from both parties. When materials enter the Q&A intake and missing-item follow-up function, school-enterprise cooperation agreements and training plans serve as the basis source, used to verify names, quantities, and dates; master-apprentice mentoring records serve as process evidence, used to determine whether signatures or receipts are complete. In multi-turn dialogue, the model combines the historical message range and answer constraints to identify missing items and ask follow-up questions, ultimately forming intake records and completed follow-up questions, which are forwarded to the handler.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The intake records and completed follow-up questions are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the prior context range required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, observe whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round, and compare the usage records of the two runs |
| School-enterprise cooperation agreement | Partner name, major, number of people, start and end dates, and signature/seal positions are consistent across all materials | Compare against the order class training plan and master-apprentice mentoring records, verify item by item whether names, quantities, dates, and signatures or receipts match, and whether versions are synchronized |
| Order class training plan | Class name, course modules, practical training arrangements, assessment methods, and approval signatures are consistent across all materials | Compare against the school-enterprise cooperation agreement and master-apprentice mentoring records, verify whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record are consistent, and check approval signatures and version synchronization |
| Master-apprentice mentoring record | Master and apprentice names, position, mentoring content, date, and signatures or receipts from both parties are complete | Compare against the school-enterprise cooperation agreement and order class training plan, verify whether the names, quantities, and dates of the same record are consistent, and check whether signatures or receipts are missing |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the school-enterprise cooperation agreement and the order class training plan. Cause: The two materials are updated separately without cross-checking, resulting in conflicting bases for intake records and completed follow-up questions.
- Phenomenon: The training plan version is not synchronized, and old course modules are mixed with new practical training arrangements. Cause: After materials are updated, they are not uniformly replaced, and expired fields are referenced during Q&A intake, causing the follow-up direction to deviate from the current training cycle.
- Phenomenon: Master-apprentice mentoring records lack signatures or receipts but are treated as complete materials during intake. Cause: Missing-item identification does not cover signature positions, the model answers based on incomplete records, and after forwarding to the handler, the materials still need to be returned for supplementation.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first; check whether the historical message range falls within the number of turns configured in the application settings, and check whether chatId, messages, and variables are passed consistently in the session.
Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it asks follow-up questions before answering; confirm that the follow-up items correspond to missing fields in the school-enterprise cooperation agreement, order class training plan, or master-apprentice mentoring records, and that the answer has material basis before being forwarded to the handler.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the references from the first round, and compare the usage records of the two runs.
- Compare the school-enterprise cooperation agreement, order class training plan, and master-apprentice mentoring records, verify item by item the names, quantities, dates, signatures, or receipts, mark unsynchronized versions and missing items, and form a list of completed follow-up questions.