What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the vocational college skills competition organization scenario, where materials are grouped into three categories: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations come from official documents issued by the organizer, with an update cadence that follows annual adjustments to competition events; registration forms are submitted by participating institutions, with fields including contestant name, ID number, group, instructor, and signature/seal; training plans are prepared by the host school or coaching team, with fields including phase dates, training content, and person-in-charge signature. When these three types of materials enter the Q&A intake and missing-item follow-up function, the regulations serve as the basis for judgment, while registration forms and training plans serve as the record sources to be checked. Q&A intake first reads the materials, then identifies missing items and generates follow-up questions, and finally forwards the completed question items together with the intake record to the person in charge for handling. Field characteristics are concentrated in four places: name, quantity, date, and signature. The same record often shows mismatches in name, quantity, or date between the regulations and the registration form, or between the registration form and the training plan, or unsynchronized versions, missing signatures, and missing receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, which outputs the response body, status code, and returned fields. The intake record and the completed question items are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreed convention. The HTTP node is only responsible for sending requests and retrieving results; it does not replace the external system in writing to the database or approving.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the name, date, and signature fields correspond item by item with the registration form | Take the event name, group, and date fields from the regulations and compare them with records of the same name in the registration form to see whether they are consistent |
| Registration form | Whether the quantity, date, and signature receipt match the training plan | Check the number of contestants, training start and end dates, and person-in-charge signature, and inspect entries missing signatures or receipts |
| Training plan | Whether the version is synchronized and whether the fields are consistent with the regulations' definitions | Compare the plan version number with the regulations' publication date, and confirm that the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not conflict |
| HTTP node request | Whether the placeholders in path parameters, request body, and request headers are parsed into actual values | In the request preview, view the fully rendered address, check the sources of Authorization and variables, and then compare the returned fields in responseData |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same contestant name is written differently in the registration form and the training plan, and the quantity also does not match. Cause: The two materials were entered separately, and fields were not unified according to the regulations' definitions.
- Symptom: The regulations have been updated, but the registration form still uses the old event name and date. Cause: The version is not synchronized, and there is no comparison step for publication and receipt between materials.
- Symptom: The registration form is missing the instructor's signature, and the training plan is missing the host's receipt. Cause: Signatures and receipts were not included in field verification, so missing items were not identified and followed up.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: preview the rendered request, check the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample; at the same time, check whether the value sources of Authorization, variables, and responseData are consistent with the returned fields.
Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- In the variables panel, check the source of each placeholder and confirm that the variables in path parameters, request body, and request headers can all be traced to global variables, system variables, or outputs of preceding nodes.
- Use one sample request to compare the return, check whether the external system receives empty fields, and verify whether the request header names and value sources conform to the external interface convention.