What this category's data looks like
The intake materials for social evaluation of vocational skill level certification mainly come from three types: the evaluation implementation plan, the candidate registration form, and the assessor dispatch form. The evaluation implementation plan provides the certification batch, occupational direction, assessment method, and time and location, and is the backbone of the intake question items; the candidate registration form carries personal information, declared level, years of work experience, and supporting materials, and is the most concentrated source of missing-item follow-up questions; the assessor dispatch form records assessors, dates, signatures, and receipts, and is used to check the consistency of the same record. Materials are updated on a rolling basis by batch, and versions change with document revisions or supplementary signatures; the field characteristics are cross-referencing across multiple tables and the coexistence of dates and signatures. When entering Q&A intake, the three types of materials each play different roles: the implementation plan constrains the scope of question items, the registration form provides the basis for individual information, and the dispatch form verifies the process and the completeness of approvals.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, and outputs the reference range of historical messages and the answer constraints. The intake records and the completed question items are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; the value should match the range of prior context required by the question. If it is too small, the prior context cannot be used; if it is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turns | Matches the range of prior context required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to observe whether the second turn can carry forward the references from the first turn |
| Candidate registration form | Name, quantity, and date match the evaluation implementation plan | Compare item by item the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Assessor dispatch form | Version and signature status are synchronized, with no missing items | Check whether the batch, date, and assessors in the dispatch form and the implementation plan are consistent, and inspect signatures and receipts |
| Consecutive follow-up | The second turn can correctly carry forward the references from the first turn | Run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether messages, chatId, and variables are correctly carried in with the turns |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same candidate record do not match between the registration form and the implementation plan. Cause: The two tables are maintained separately, no cross-check is performed, and versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The assessor dispatch form lacks a signature or receipt, yet intake question items are still answered. Cause: Material completeness is not included in the follow-up conditions, and missing items are not identified.
- Phenomenon: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, and the response becomes slower with increased consumption. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the range of prior context, bringing in irrelevant history.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: with two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question; check whether messages, chatId, and variables are correctly carried in with the turns.
Business test: ask a question that lacks key information, and see whether it first asks a follow-up before answering; missing items are identified and followed up on, and the answer has a material basis.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, and compare it with the range of prior context required by the question
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, and compare the usage records of the two runs