HTTP Integrations for Enterprise Employee Skills Assessment: Handle Questions and Collect Missing Information

Employee Skills: review HTTP for question intake. Compare the source records, required inputs and downstream results before handing the task over.

What this category's data looks like

Materials for question acceptance and missing-item follow-up in enterprise self-directed skilled talent evaluation come from the enterprise evaluation filing form, the evaluation specification, and the candidate roster. The filing form gives the evaluation agency and the scope of occupations (trades); the evaluation specification gives the assessment methods and pass standards; the roster gives candidate identity and declared level. In terms of update cadence, the filing form is synchronized with filing changes, the evaluation specification is iterated by version number, and the roster is imported by batch. When materials enter this function, the filing form and evaluation specification are used to determine whether the evaluation matters involved in the question fall within the acceptance scope, and the roster is used to check whether the candidate is in the current batch list. The fields, dates, and signatures of the three materials must be mutually corroborated; when names, quantities, or dates are inconsistent or versions are not synchronized, missing-item follow-up will ask follow-up questions first before answering.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the HTTP node in the workflow, outputting the response body, status code, and returned fields. The "acceptance record and completed question items" are parsed from the response by subsequent nodes, or handled by an external system according to the agreement to complete the rest.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Enterprise evaluation filing formThe filed occupation (trade), level, and evaluation agency name must be consistent with the evaluation specification, and signatures and dates must be completeVerify whether the occupation name, level, and evaluation agency in the filing form and evaluation specification correspond item by item, and check signatures and receipts
Evaluation specificationThe version number and effective date must match the current acceptance batch, and the assessment method and pass standard fields must be completeVerify whether the version number and effective date are synchronized to the latest, and compare the names and quantities of the same record in the two materials
Candidate rosterCandidate name, ID number, declared level, and batch date must match the filing form and evaluation specificationVerify whether the number of people, levels, and dates in the roster and filing form are consistent, and check entries missing signatures or receipts
Request URL and path parametersPlaceholder variables can be resolved into actual valuesView the rendered full URL in the request preview

Three common errors

  • Symptom: the level of the same candidate does not match between the roster and the filing form. Cause: the two materials have different update cadences, and the versions are not synchronized.
  • Symptom: the occupation name in the evaluation specification is inconsistent with the wording in the filing form. Cause: after a name change, only one material was modified, and receipt confirmation is missing.
  • Symptom: the request returns 401 or the external system receives empty fields. Cause: the value source of Authorization was not verified, and variables were not parsed.

How to verify the setup

This function's acceptance: preview the rendered request, verify the status code and returned fields, then compare the result against one sample; at the same time, verify the value sources of the three identifiers Authorization, variables, and responseData.

Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it asks follow-up questions first before answering.

  • In the variables panel, verify the source of each placeholder and confirm that variables can be traced to global variables, system variables, or the output of preceding nodes.
  • Use one sample request to compare the response body, verify that the responseData fields are consistent with the external interface agreement, and verify the request header names and value sources.