What this category's data looks like
In the enterprise self-directed skilled-talent evaluation scenario, the materials entering the Q&A intake and missing-item follow-up stage are mainly of three types: the enterprise evaluation filing form, the evaluation specification, and the candidate roster. The filing form carries fields such as the evaluation agency, occupation name, level, and filing date; the evaluation specification gives the application conditions, assessment methods, and scoring criteria; the roster records candidate names, ID numbers, declared occupations, and employer information. The material sources are submission by the declaring unit and aggregation by the handler, and the update cadence keeps pace with declaration batches and filing changes. When the three types of materials enter this function, their roles differ: the filing form is used to confirm whether the evaluation matter falls within the filing scope, the evaluation specification is used to judge whether a missing question item is a required field, and the roster is used to check whether the candidate identity and declaration record are consistent. In terms of field characteristics, dates, quantities, signatures, and receipts are high-frequency checkpoints, and the same record must keep names, quantities, and dates consistent across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool-calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). "Intake records and completed question items" are then handled by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter descriptions, and whether parameters are required, the model judges whether to call the tool this time; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise evaluation filing form | Check whether the evaluation agency, occupation name, level, and filing date fields are complete, and whether signatures or receipts are missing | Open the tool node description field and confirm the description states the purpose, when to use it, and the return result; run a test with a question missing the filing date and observe whether it asks a follow-up question first |
| Evaluation specification | Check the application conditions, assessment methods, and scoring criteria fields, and confirm the version is consistent with the filing form | Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the parameter description and whether it is required, and confirm the required items correspond to fields that actually exist in the specification |
| Candidate roster | Check the candidate name, ID number, declared occupation, and employer fields, and confirm that the same record has consistent names, quantities, and dates in the filing form and the roster | Check the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas, and check whether the tool-calling node is connected to the target tool; run a test with a question missing the ID number |
| Intake records and completed question items | Confirm that missing items are identified and followed up on, that answers are based on materials, and that they can be forwarded to the handler | Check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm that the return result does not contain values that do not exist in the materials; when toolChoice and functionCall are involved, check the source of their values |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the filing form and the roster. Cause: the two materials are entered in different steps, and no field-level comparison was performed.
- Symptom: the evaluation specification version is not synchronized, and the application conditions are inconsistent with the filing form. Cause: the materials have different update cadences, and the old version is still circulating in the process.
- Symptom: the filing form is missing a signature or receipt, yet intake still continues. Cause: the required parameters were not stated in the tool description, so the model did not trigger a follow-up question.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run a test with a question missing required parameters, check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; at the same time, check toolChoice, functionCall, and the connection status of the tool-calling node.
Business test: submit a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Open the tool node description field, check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, and confirm it states the purpose, when to use it, and the return result.
- Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the parameter description and whether it is required, and confirm the required items correspond to fields that actually exist in the business materials.