What this category's data looks like
This page addresses corporate compliance and safety training scenarios. The materials include three categories: compliance training courseware, safety operating procedures, and exam records. Courseware comes from policy release channels and is updated by version number and release date; its fields include course name, applicable position, effective date, and preparer and approval signatures. Procedures come from the safety production department and are revised as regulations and processes change; their fields include clause number, operating steps, risk control, version, and signed receipt. Exam records come from the training management system and are generated by batch; their fields include personnel name, exam paper name, score, exam date, and invigilator signature. When the three material categories enter the question intake and missing-item follow-up function, their roles differ: courseware and procedures are retrieved and cited as the basis for answers, while exam records serve as fact-checking materials used to compare personnel, dates, and signature status. Intake records and completed follow-up questions are generated by the model in combination with the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. After missing items are identified, a follow-up question is asked before answering; when materials are inconsistent, which document prevails is indicated, and the matter is ultimately forwarded to the responsible person for handling.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. Intake records and completed follow-up questions are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | The four items—course name, applicable position, effective date, and preparer and approval signatures—must be aligned item by item with the exam records | Retrieve the courseware version page and the exam record batch page, verify the course name, effective date, and signature fields; compare the conversation context associated with chatId |
| Safety operating procedures | Clause number, operating steps, risk control, version, and signed receipt must be consistent with the training sign-in materials | Extract procedure clauses and sign-in receipts, verify the version number and receipt date; check whether the procedure clauses referenced in messages are consistent with the current version |
| Exam records | Personnel name, exam paper name, score, exam date, and invigilator signature must correspond to the courseware and procedures | Export exam records by batch, verify whether names and dates are consistent with the sign-in receipts; use variables to record missing fields and trigger follow-up questions |
| Intake records and completed follow-up questions | Missing items are identified and followed up on, answers are based on materials, and the matter can be forwarded to the responsible person for handling | Ask a question missing key information and see whether a follow-up question is asked before answering; verify whether the follow-up items cover the four categories of missing items: name, quantity, date, and signature |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course name and date for the same record do not match between the courseware and the exam records. Cause: The two materials are maintained through different channels, versions are not synchronized, and item-by-item comparison was not performed during intake.
- Symptom: A procedure clause has been revised, but the sign-in receipt still references the old version number. Cause: The release cadence and the training cadence are offset, and the missing-item follow-up did not list the version number as a required item.
- Symptom: An exam record lacks an invigilator signature or receipt but is treated as complete material during intake. Cause: Missing-item identification only checks whether fields are empty and does not verify whether the signature field and receipt attachment exist.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: conduct two consecutive follow-up turns and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; verify whether the reference scope of chatId, messages, and variables in the conversation matches the memory turns.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether a follow-up question is asked before answering; after missing items are identified and followed up on, verify whether the answer is based on materials, then forward the matter to the responsible person for handling.
- In the application settings, verify the current value of memory turns, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second question correctly inherits the reference from the first question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that run consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns, and check that the opening message is not treated as prior context.