What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for enterprise compliance and security training scenarios. The materials come from three categories: compliance training courseware, security operating procedures, and exam records. Courseware is usually revised on an annual or regulatory-update cadence, and its fields include course name, applicable position, version date, training duration, and signature field; procedures are divided into volumes by equipment or operation type, and their fields include operation steps, risk points, effective date, approval signature, and receipt number; exam records are archived by batch, and their fields include candidate name, exam paper version, score, exam date, and invigilator signature. When the materials enter this feature, courseware and procedures serve as compliance basis and operating standards, and exam records serve as execution evidence and personnel coverage proof. Together, the three support Q&A intake and missing-item follow-up questions: first identify which type of material the question involves, then determine whether the existing materials can answer it. When key fields are missing, ask a follow-up question first, and do not directly fabricate.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), and outputs the tool call result (the input parameters and return in the call record). "Intake records and completed question items" are then completed by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. Based on the tool description, parameter description, and whether parameters are required, the model decides whether to call the tool this time; when there are no required parameters, the model may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | Fields include course name, applicable position, version date, training duration, and signature field; the name and date of the same courseware in two materials may not match, and when the version is not synchronized, the old version is still referenced | Open the tool node description field and check whether the description can be understood on its own; run a test with a question missing the course name to see whether it asks a follow-up question first; check the diamond-shaped connections and node status on the canvas |
| Security operating procedures | Fields include operation steps, risk points, effective date, approval signature, and receipt number; when the signature or receipt is missing, it cannot be used as evidence of completed training, and the quantity and date of the same procedure in two materials may be inconsistent | Open each parameter configuration one by one and check the two items: parameter description and whether it is required; confirm that the required parameters correspond to the procedure fields; run a test with a question missing the effective date to see whether it asks a follow-up question first instead of directly fabricating |
| Exam records | Fields include candidate name, exam paper version, score, exam date, and invigilator signature; when the name, quantity, or date of the same record in two materials does not match, a follow-up question is needed to complete it | Check whether the tool description states the purpose, when it should be used, and what it returns; check whether the returned result contains values that do not exist in the business materials; confirm that after multiple tools are chained, the results do not cross over into each other |
| Tool calling node | The model decides whether to call based on the tool description, parameter description, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, it may fabricate parameter values, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call | Check on the canvas that the diamond-shaped interface is connected to the target tool; run a test with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the course name and date of the same training record do not match between the courseware and the exam record. Cause: the two materials' versions are not synchronized, the old courseware version is still referenced, and verification was not performed against the effective date.
- Symptom: values that do not exist in the business materials appear in the returned result. Cause: the parameter was marked as required, but the prompt did not guide a follow-up question, so the model fabricated the parameter value on its own.
- Symptom: a security operating procedure missing a signature or receipt is still treated as evidence of completed training. Cause: the tool description did not state when it should be used, the model did not call the tool, and it directly gave an answer.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run a test with a question missing a required parameter, check the input parameters and return in the call record, and confirm whether it asks a follow-up question or calls according to the description; check toolChoice, functionCall, and the tool description fields, confirm that the required parameters correspond to the business material fields, and ensure that the returned result does not contain values that do not exist in the materials.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it asks a follow-up question before answering.
- Open the tool node description field and check whether this description can be understood when taken out on its own, stating the purpose, when it should be used, and what result it returns.
- Open each parameter configuration one by one, check the two items of description and whether it is required, and run a test with a question missing that field to see whether it asks a follow-up question first instead of directly fabricating.