What this category's data looks like
The intake materials for general college entrance examination registration qualification review mainly come from three categories: the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers. The college entrance examination registration form is filled in by the candidate and confirmed by the school or registration point, with fields including name, ID number, household registration address, examination subject category, signature, and date; the household registration and student status certificates are issued by the public security authorities and the school, including the date of household registration move-in, the start and end of student status, and the school seal; materials for children accompanying migrant workers include residence permits, social insurance payment records, and parents' employment certificates. Materials are submitted in a concentrated manner according to the registration season, and the update rhythm is based on the annual registration notice. The field characteristic is that the same record appears repeatedly in multiple materials, and it is necessary to compare whether the name, quantity, date, and signature receipt are consistent. When entering the Q&A intake and missing-item follow-up function, the registration form serves as the main record, and the household registration and student status certificates and materials for children accompanying migrant workers serve as supporting evidence, used to identify missing items and generate follow-up questions for completion.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The intake records and the follow-up questions for completion are then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| College entrance examination registration form | Whether the name, ID number, household registration address, examination subject category, signature, and date are consistent with the supporting materials | Check the name, date, and signature of the same record in the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates; use chatId to associate the messages of the same session |
| Household registration and student status certificates | Whether the date of household registration move-in, the start and end of student status, and the school seal match the corresponding fields in the registration form | Compare the dates and seals; when signatures or receipts are missing, list them as follow-up questions for completion; backfill and check the field values in variables |
| Materials for children accompanying migrant workers | Whether the quantity and dates of residence permits, social insurance payment records, and parents' employment certificates are version-synchronized | Check whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials are consistent; mark those whose versions are not synchronized as pending completion |
| Multi-turn dialogue and prompts | Whether the second-round follow-up can carry forward the references from the first round and ask about missing items | Run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, and check whether the range of historical messages in messages matches the preceding text required by the question |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same candidate's name is written inconsistently in the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates. Cause: the two materials were entered at different times, and field comparison and receipt verification were not performed.
- Phenomenon: the social insurance date in the materials for children accompanying migrant workers does not match the residence permit date. Cause: the material versions were not synchronized, and old-version records remain in the intake records.
- Phenomenon: the registration form lacks a signature or receipt, but after follow-up it still answers based on the existing content. Cause: the missing item was not identified as a follow-up question, and the prompt did not constrain it to ask first and then answer.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: with two consecutive rounds of follow-up, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and check the reference range of historical messages in messages and the field values in variables.
Business test: ask a question that lacks key information, and see whether it asks first and then answers.
- In the application settings, check the current value of the memory turn count, run a trial with two consecutive rounds of questions, and confirm that the second round can correctly carry forward the references from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm that the run consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turn count, and check that the opening message is not treated as preceding text.