What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the regular higher education institution admissions enrollment and filing business, with materials drawn from three categories: enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters. Enrollment plans include institution-major groups, planned numbers, batches, and dates; filing rules include filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, volunteer rounds, and signature fields; admission rosters include candidate numbers, names, filing scores, admitted majors, receipts, and seals. Materials are updated by batch or round, and the names, quantities, and dates of the same record often appear inconsistent across different materials; versions being out of sync, missing signatures, or missing receipts also occur from time to time. When entering the Q&A acceptance and missing-item follow-up function, enrollment plans and filing rules are used to verify the filing basis, and admission rosters are used to verify result fields; together the three support missing-item identification and follow-up questions, and are transferred to subsequent handler processing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the tool calling node in the workflow (the model decides whether to call, and the node executes), outputting the tool call result (the inputs and returns in the call record). Acceptance records and the completed follow-up items are then completed by subsequent AI nodes or manual verification. The model judges whether to call based on the tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether parameters are required; when there are no required parameters, it may fabricate parameter values on its own, and when there are required parameters but no suitable value in the context, it may not call, requiring prompt guidance.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plans | Check whether institution-major groups, planned numbers, batches, and dates are consistent with the filing rules | Open the tool node introduction field and check whether the description can be understood independently; check the parameter introduction and whether required items one by one, and confirm they correspond to the enrollment plan fields |
| Filing rules | Check whether filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, volunteer rounds, and signature fields are complete | Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool, and check whether parameter values come from the filing rules materials |
| Admission rosters | Check whether candidate numbers, names, filing scores, admitted majors, receipts, and seals are complete | Run a trial with a question missing roster fields to see whether it asks follow-up questions first rather than fabricating directly; check whether the inputs and returns in the call record contain values that do not exist in the materials |
| Tool calling node | Check whether the model decides to call based on the introduction and required parameters, and does not directly give an answer | Check the toolChoice, functionCall related configurations and prompts, and confirm that after multiple tools are chained, the results do not cross-talk |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same candidate name is written differently in the enrollment plan and the admission roster. Cause: the entry standards for the two materials are not unified, lacking field-level comparison and receipt verification.
- Phenomenon: the filing rules version does not match the admission roster date. Cause: versions are not synchronized, old rules are still referenced, and update cadence and signature confirmation are lacking.
- Phenomenon: the call result contains values that do not exist in the materials. Cause: when there are no required parameters, the model fabricates parameter values on its own, or required parameters lack follow-up guidance.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run a trial with a question missing required parameters, check the inputs and returns in the call record, and confirm whether it asks follow-up questions or calls according to the introduction; at the same time check toolChoice, functionCall, and the three configurations: tool introduction, parameter introduction, and whether required.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it asks follow-up questions before answering; if a citation limit is involved, check the tokens of the cited text, record the array count separately, quoteMaxToken is the citation content budget, and the two are not compared for equality.
- Open the parameter configurations one by one, check the introduction and whether required items, and confirm they correspond to fields that actually exist in the enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters.
- Check the diamond connectors and node status on the canvas, confirm that the tool calling node is connected to the target tool, and run a trial with a question missing fields to observe whether it asks follow-up questions first.