What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three core types of materials: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms are filled in by candidates and initially reviewed by registration points; their fields include name, ID number, application level, subject category, preferences, date, and signature. Care bonus-point materials are submitted by candidates and reviewed by relevant departments; their fields include bonus item, certificate number, validity period, review opinion, and receipt. Admission rosters are reported by admitting institutions and filed with provincial-level agencies; their fields include candidate number, admitted major, admission batch, admission date, and seal. The three types of materials update at different rhythms: registration forms roll with the registration cycle, care bonus-point materials are supplemented according to review batches, and admission rosters are archived in a concentrated manner after admission ends. When the materials enter the question answering intake and missing-item follow-up function, registration forms play the role of verifying identity and application information, care bonus-point materials play the role of verifying qualifications and certificates, and admission rosters play the role of confirming admission results and filing.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The intake records and the questions to be completed are then handled by the model. Memory turns control how many previous rounds of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Whether it is consistent with care bonus-point materials and admission rosters in name, ID number, application level, and date; whether signatures and receipts are complete | Retrieve the registration form and care bonus-point materials of the same candidate, compare names, quantities, and dates field by field; check signatures and receipts; use chatId to associate multi-turn follow-up records in the same session |
| Care bonus-point materials | Whether the bonus item, certificate number, validity period, and review opinion correspond to the registration form and admission roster; whether versions are synchronized | Check whether the bonus item name, certificate number, and date in the care bonus-point materials and the registration form match; when versions are not synchronized, confirm that the latest reviewed document prevails; use messages to trace the bonus items mentioned earlier |
| Admission roster | Whether the admitted major, batch, and date are consistent with the registration form preferences and care bonus-point materials; whether seals and filing receipts are complete | Compare the preferences in the admission roster and registration form, and the bonus items in the care bonus-point materials; check the admission date and batch; when signatures or receipts are missing, list them as follow-up questions; use variables to record fields to be completed |
| Question answering intake record | Whether missing items are identified and followed up; whether answers are based on materials; whether they are transferred to the handling person | Ask a question missing key information and see whether it first follows up before answering; check whether the intake record and the questions to be completed are complete; confirm the destination for transfer to the handling person |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same candidate do not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The two materials are entered at different stages, versions are not synchronized, and cross-material consistency checks are lacking.
- Phenomenon: The certificate number and validity period of care bonus-point materials are inconsistent with the registration form record. Cause: After the review batch is updated, it is not written back to the registration form, causing the quantity and date of the same record to mismatch between the two materials.
- Phenomenon: The admission roster lacks a signature or receipt, but the intake record still shows that it can be transferred to the handling person. Cause: Missing-item identification does not cover the signature and receipt fields, and follow-up questions are not generated.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: conduct two consecutive follow-up rounds and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; check whether chatId and messages fall within the historical message range set by memory turns.
Business test: ask a question missing key information and see whether it first follows up before answering; confirm that the intake record and the questions to be completed are based on materials and are transferred to the handling person.
- In the application settings, check the current value of memory turns and match it with the preceding context range required by the question; run a trial with two consecutive questions to confirm that the second round can correctly inherit the reference from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns; check whether the opening message is treated as preceding context, avoiding bringing in irrelevant content.