What this category's data looks like
This page centers on journal three-review three-proofreading and editorial quality, with materials drawn from three types: three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records. Three-review forms carry the fields, dates, and signatures of initial review, re-review, and final review; proofs carry edition, page numbers, change marks, and receipts; proofreading records carry proofreading rounds, error types, quantities, and signatures. Materials are updated according to manuscript batches and proofreading round cadence, and the names, quantities, and dates of the same manuscript across different materials must be aligned item by item. After entering the knowledge base retrieval service, three-review forms, proofs, and proofreading records serve respectively as candidate chunk sources for recall and reranking.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and limit truncation). Intake records and supplemented question items are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Three-review form | Whether fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and whether the name and quantity of the same record match across the two materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to hybrid, check whether candidate chunks contain three-review form fields and signatures; compare the order of the top few items before and after enabling rerank |
| Proof | Whether edition, page numbers, change marks, and receipts are in sync, and whether missing signatures or receipts are identified | Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, record the number of candidate items and the similarity score, and see whether key proof chunks are retained |
| Proofreading record | Whether proofreading rounds, error types, quantities, and dates are consistent with the three-review form and proof | Adjust limit and usingReRank, check the tokens and array item count of the cited text, and confirm that key original chunks are still retained after truncation |
| Intake records and supplemented question items | Whether missing items are identified and followed up on, and whether answers have material basis | Ask a question missing key information, see whether it follows up before answering, then forward it to the handler |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the three-review form and the proof. Cause: material versions are not in sync, and field definitions are inconsistent.
- Symptom: a proofreading record missing a signature or receipt is still recalled as complete material. Cause: missing items are not identified, and the follow-up step is absent.
- Symptom: there are many candidates but the ones ranked at the front are all irrelevant, and the answer lacks key paragraphs. Cause: the retrieval mode does not match the material form, and rerank and filter were not performed.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and similarity scores, then toggle usingReRank on and off to see the ranking of the top few items.
Business test: ask a question missing key information, and see whether it follows up before answering.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand compare the number of candidates and scores for semantic, full-text, and hybrid. - Adjust
limitandusingReRank, check the tokens of the cited text, and record the array item count separately.